Chapter 2: What Constitutes Persuasion?
Chapter Summary
This chapter explores ways that persuasion has been conceptualized and defined. A broad-based, far-reaching conceptualization of persuasion is offered. The chapter begins by presenting a preliminary model of persuasion that distinguishes clear or “pure” cases of persuasion from less obvious, “borderline” forms of persuasion. Five limiting criteria are presented that help distinguish pure from borderline cases of persuasion. The criteria are the degree of intentionality, the effect or outcome, the presence of free will and conscious awareness, whether symbolic action (e.g., language) is required, and whether self-persuasion or intrapersonal persuasion is included. The final model adds culture, context, and other factors. The chapter examines two theories of persuasion: Petty and Cacioppo’s elaboration likelihood model (ELM), and Chaiken and Eagly’s heuristic-systematic model of (HSM).
Quiz
Essay Questions
- What is one of the primary weaknesses of relying on intentionality as a defining characteristic of persuasion?
- What are the limitations of using an “effects” standard as the basis for a definition of persuasion?
- Do the textbook authors believe there is such a thing as self-persuasion? Why or why not?
