Key Readings

  • Chapter 1 – Key Readings

    Combe, G. (1828). The Constitution of Man Considered in Relation to External Objects. Edinburgh: Maclachlan & Stewart. 

    Eling P., & Finger, S. (2020). Franz Joseph Gall’s non-cortical faculties and their organs. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 56(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21994 

    Finger, S., & Eling, P. (2022). The quest for objectivity and measurements in phrenology’s “bumpy” history. History of Psychology, 25(3), 211‑244. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000213 

    Finger, S. (2019). Mark Twain’s life-long fascination with phrenology. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences 55(2), 99­-121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21960  

    Lilleleht, E. (2015). “Assuming the privilege” of bridging divides: Abigail Fowler-Chumos, practical phrenology, and America’s Gilded Age. History of Psychology, 18(4), 414–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039476 

    Lilleleht, E. (2022). An organ of murder: Crime, violence, and phrenology in nineteenth-century America. Rutgers University Press.  

    Parker Jones, O., Alfaro-Almagro, F., & Jbabdi. S., (2018). An empirical, 21st  century evaluation of phrenology. Cortex, 106, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.04.011 

    Poskett, J. (2019). Materials of the Mind: Phrenology, race, and the global history of science, 1815-1920. University of Chicago Press.  

    Sysling, F. (2021). Phrenology and the average person, 1840–1940. History of the Human Sciences, 34(2), 27-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120984070 

    Van Wyhe, J. (2004). Phrenology and the origins of Victorian scientific naturalism. Aldershot: Ashgate.

  • Chapter 2 – Key Readings

    Barnes, J. (2021). Revisiting the ‘Darwin–Marx correspondence’: Multiple discovery and the rhetoric of priority. History of the Human Sciences, 35(2), 29-54. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211019226 

    Bradley, B. (2020). Darwin’s psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198708216.001.0001

    de Carvalho, V. O., & Coelho, N. E. (2024). Freudian naturalism and the assessment of psychoanalysis as a natural science: Psychic phenomenon as process. Theory & Psychology, 34(2), 170-190. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241229047 

    Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Modern application of evolutionary theory to psychology: Key concepts and clarifications. The American Journal of Psychology, 119(4), 567-584. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445364   

    Jarrett, S. (2020). Consciousness reduced: The role of the ‘idiot’ in early evolutionary psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 33(5), 110-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120911557 

    Malone, J. C. (2021). Darwin, Darwinism, and psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 49(24), 1053-8348. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27204272  

    Pichel, B. (2016). From facial expressions to bodily gestures: Passions, photography and movement in French 19th-century sciences. History of the Human Sciences, 29(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695115618592 

    Racine, T. P. (2021). The rhetorical use of B. F. Skinner in evolutionary psychology. Theory & Psychology, 32(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211030342 

    Richards, R. J. (1987). Darwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior. University of Chicago Press  

    Richardson, A. (2013). After Darwin: Animals, emotions, and the mind. Rodopi. 

    Wackers, G. (2025). Digital phenotyping of the mind: From biology to psychoinformatics. Theory & Psychology, 35(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543251322116 

  • Chapter 20 – Key Readings

    Asprem, E. (2010), A nice arrangement of heterodoxies: William Mcdougall and the professionalization of psychical research. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 46(2) 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20422 

    Blum, D. (2014). Ghost hunters: William James and the search for scientific proof of life after death. Penguin Books. 

    Cypert, R., & Petro, M. S. (2024). A faith in science: Gardner Murphy and parapsychology. History of the Human Sciences, 38(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241280534 

    Evrard, R., Pratte, E. A., & Cardeña, E. (2018). Pierre Janet and the enchanted boundary of psychical research. History of Psychology, 21(2), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000086 

    Gyimesi, J. (2012). Sándor Ferenczi and the problem of telepathy. History of the Human Sciences, 25(2), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111434253 

    Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48(6), 781-795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325 

    Hacking, I. (1988). Telepathy: Origins of randomization in experimental design. Isis, 79, 427–451. http://www.jstor.org/stable/234674 

    Kloosterman, I. (2012). Psychical research and parapsychology interpreted: suggestions from the international historiography of psychical research and parapsychology for investigating its history in the Netherlands. History of the Human Sciences, 25(2), 2-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695111421580 

    Lachapelle, S. (2005). Attempting science: the creation and early development of the Institut Métapsychique International in Paris, 1919-1931. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20061 

    Lamont, P. (2013). Spiritualism and a mid-Victorian crisis of evidence. Historical Journal, 56(3), 833–860. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0018246X04004030 

    Mülberger, A., & Balltondre, M. (2012). Metapsychics in Spain: acknowledging or questioning the marvellous? History of the Human Sciences, 25(2), 108-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112439374 

    Owen, A. (1989). The darkened room: Women, power and spiritualism in late nineteenth century England. Virago. 

    Parra, A. (2025), Spiritualism and Psychology in Argentina: The Inception of Parapsychology in the Scientific Mainstream (1948–1955). Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 61: e70035.https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.70035 

    Sommer, A. (2012). Psychical research and the origins of American psychology: Hugo Münsterberg, William James and Eusapia Palladino. History of the Human Sciences, 25(2), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112439376 

    Wolffram, H. (2006), Parapsychology on the couch: The psychology of occult belief in Germany, c. 1870–1939. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 42(3) 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20171 

    Wooffitt, R., & Allistone, S. (2005). Towards a Discursive Parapsychology: Language and the Laboratory Study of Anomalous Communication. Theory & Psychology, 15(3), 325-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354305053218 

  • Chapter 19 – Key Readings

    Bultman, S. (2020). Seeing inside the child: The Rorschach inkblot test as assessment technique in a girls’ reform school, 1938–1948. History of Psychology, 23(4), 312–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000167 

    Burman, E. (2017). Deconstructing developmental psychology (Third edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 

    Gigerenzer, G. (1992). Discovery in cognitive psychology: New tools inspire new theories. Science in Context, 5(2), 329–350. doi:10.1017/S0269889700001216

    Harris, B. (2011). Arnold Gesell’s progressive vision: Child hygiene, socialism and eugenics. History of Psychology, 14(3), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024797 

    Moro, C. (2016). To encounter, to build the world and to become a human being. Advocating for a material-cultural turn in developmental psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50(4), 586–602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-016-9356-4 

    Ossmer, C. (2020). Normal development: The photographic dome and the children of the Yale Psycho-Clinic. Isis, 111(3), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1086/711127 

    Ratcliff, M. J. (2024). Jean Piaget and the autonomous disciples, Alina Szeminska and Bärbel Inhelder: From the “critical method” to the appropriation of research culture. History of Psychology, 27(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000261 

    Rietmann, F. E. (2023). Mother-blaming revisited: Gender, cinematography, and infant research in the heyday of psychoanalysis. History of the Human Sciences, 37(2), 87-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231187556 

    Rowold, K. (2024). Child psychology from Vienna to London: Charlotte Bühler, concepts of childhood, and parenting advice in interwar Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 38(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241289028 

    Sims-Schouten, W. (2021). ‘A troublesome girl is pushed through’: Morality, biological determinism, resistance, resilience, and the Canadian child migration schemes, 1883–1939. History of the Human Sciences, 35(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211036553 

    Skagius, P. (2019). Brains and psyches: Child psychological and psychiatric expertise in a Swedish newspaper, 1980–2008. History of the Human Sciences, 32(3), 76-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695118810284 

    van der Horst, F. C. P., van Rosmalen, L., & van der Veer, R. (2019). Research notes: John Bowlby’s critical evaluation of the work of René Spitz. History of Psychology, 22(2), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000127b

  • Chapter 18 – Key Readings

    Alder, K. (2002). A social history of untruth: Lie detection and trust in twentieth-century America, Representations, 80(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1525/rep.2002.80.1.1

    Alder, K. (2007). The lie detectors: The history of an American obsession. New York: Free Press.

    Balmer, A.S. & Sandland, R. (2012). Making monsters: The polygraph, the plethysmograph, and other practices for the performance of abnormal sexuality.  Journal of Law and Society, 39(4), 593-615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00601.x

    Balmer, A.S. (2018). Lie detection and the law: Torture, technology and truth. Routledge.

    Bunn, G. C. (2007). Spectacular science: The lie detector’s ambivalent powers. History of Psychology, 10(2), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.156

    Bunn, G. C. (2012). The truth machine: A social history of the lie detector. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Bunn, G. C. (2019). ‘Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?’: The lie detector, the love machine, and the logic of fantasy. History of the Human Sciences, 32(5), 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119867022

    Derksen, M. (2012). Control and resistance in the psychology of lying. Theory & Psychology, 22(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311427487

    Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.

    Littlefield, M. M. (2011). The lying brain: Lie detection in science and science fiction. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Scott, P., & von Unger, H. (2021). Discourses on im/migrants, ethnic minorities, and infectious disease: Fifty years of tuberculosis reporting in the United Kingdom. History of the Human Sciences, 35(1), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211015886

    Sims-Schouten, W., Riley, S. C. E., & Willig, C. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women’s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307073153

    Viner, R. (1996), Melanie Klein and Anna Freud: The discourse of the early dispute. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 32(1), 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6696(199601)32:1<4::AID-JHBS1>3.0.CO;2-Y

  • Chapter 17 – Key Readings

    Boudewijnse, G.-J. A., Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (2001). The fate of Herbart’s mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 4(2), 107–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.4.2.107 

    Cowles, M. (2001). Statistics in Psychology: An historical perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum. 

    Crone, G., & Green, C. D. (2025). Tools of the data detective: A review of statistical methods to detect data and result anomalies in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 35(3), 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241311861 

    Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge University Press. 

    Friendly, M. and Denis, D. (2005), The early origins and development of the scatterplot. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 41(2), 103-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20078 

    Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Krüger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge University Press. 

    Lamiell, J. T. (2018). Re-centering psychology: From variables and statistics to persons and their stories. Theory & Psychology, 29(2), 282-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318766714 

    Lovie, S., & Lovie, P. (2004). A privileged and exemplar resource: Traumatic avoidance learning and the early triumph of mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 7(3), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.7.3.248 

    Lusinchi, D. (2022). Kiær and the rebirth of the representative method: A case-study in controversy management at the International Statistical Institute (1895–1903). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 58(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22145 

    Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88(3), 355–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02641.x 

    Morozova, S. V. (2022). How statistics became a “forbidden trick” for Soviet psychologists. History of Psychology, 25(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000204 

    Salsburg, D. (2013). The lady tasting tea: How statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century. Henry Holt and Company. 

    Uygun Tunç, D., Tunç, M. N., & Lakens, D. (2023). The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests. Theory & Psychology, 33(3), 403-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231160112 

  • Chapter 16 – Key Readings

    Angel, K. (2012). Contested psychiatric ontology and feminist critique: ‘Female Sexual Dysfunction’ and the Diagnostic and Statistical ManualHistory of the Human Sciences, 25(4), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112456949 

    Borbely, A.F. (2008). Metaphor and psychoanalysis. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp.412-424). Cambridge University Press. 

    Bueskens, P. (2014). Mothering and psychoanalysis: Clinical, Sociological and feminist perspectives. Demeter Press. 

    Copperman, J., & Chaney, S. (2024). The politics of recovery: Women’s mental health activism in the UK, 1986–2002, with a focus on Bristol Crisis Service for Women. History of the Human Sciences, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241289061 

    Haaken, J. (2008). When White Buffalo Calf Woman meets Oedipus on the road: Lakota Psychology, feminist psychoanalysis, and male violence. Theory & Psychology, 18(2), 195-208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307087881 

    Harris, B. (2021). Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig. History of Psychology, 24(4), 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000200 

    Hubbard K. (2017) Queer signs: The women of the British projective test movement. Journal of the History of Behavioural Sciences, 53(3), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21863 

    Johnston, E. & Johnson A. (2017) Balancing life and work by unbending gender: Early American women psychologists’ struggles and contributions. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 53(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21862 

    Kontopodis, M., & Jackowska, M. (2019). De-centring the psychology curriculum: Diversity, social justice, and psychological knowledge. Theory & Psychology, 29(4), 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319858419 

    Launer, J. (2014). Sex versus survival: the life and ideas of Sabina Spielrein. Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd. 

    Rowold, K. (2024). Child psychology from Vienna to London: Charlotte Bühler, concepts of childhood, and parenting advice in interwar Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 38(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241289028 

    Rutherford, A. (2018). Feminism, psychology, and the gendering of neoliberal subjectivity: From critique to disruption. Theory & Psychology, 28(5), 619-644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318797194 

    Spielrein, S. (1912/1994). Destruction as the cause of coming into being. Journal of Analytical Psychology39(2), 155–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1994.00155.x  Stone, A. (2011). Feminism, psychoanalysis, and maternal subjectivity. Taylor & Francis.

  • Chapter 15 – Key Readings

    Banicki, K. (2017). The character–personality distinction: An historical, conceptual, and functional investigation. Theory & Psychology, 27(1), 50-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316684689 

    Bullard, A. (2005). The critical impact of Frantz Fanon and Henri Collomb: Race, gender, and personality testing of North and West Africans. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 41(3), 225-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20102 

    Cieciuch, J. (2012). The Big Five and Big Ten: Between Aristotelian and Galileian physics of personality. Theory & Psychology, 22(5), 689-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311432904 

    Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Sage. 

    Dumont, F. (2010). A history of personality psychology: Theory, science, and research from Hellenism to the twenty-first century. Cambridge University Press.  

    Fierro, C. (2022). How did early North American clinical psychologists get their first personality test? Carl Gustav Jung, the Zurich School of Psychiatry, and the development of the “Word Association Test” (1898–1909). History of Psychology, 25(4), 295–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000218 

    Gibby, R. E., & Zickar, M. J. (2008). A history of the early days of personality testing in American industry: An obsession with adjustment. History of Psychology, 11(3), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013041 

    Hajek, K. M. (2021). Félida, doubled personality, and the ‘normal state’ in late 19th-century French psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 34(2), 66-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120980648 

    Percival, T., & Bergstrom-Katz, S. (2025). The material force of categories. History of the Human Sciences, 38(2), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951251318223 

    Pilgrim, D. (2023). Verdicts on Hans Eysenck and the fluxing context of British psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 36(3-4), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221143888 

    Susman, W. (1984). Culture as history: The transformation of American society in the twentieth century. Pantheon.  Treviño, A. J. (2023). Talcott Parsons on building personality system theory via psychoanalysis. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 59, 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22257

  • Chapter 14 – Key Readings

    Ackers, P. (2006), The history of occupational psychology: A view from industrial relations. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(2), 213-216. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317906X100666 

    Baritz, L. (1960). The servants of power: A history of the use of social science in American industry. Wesleyan University Press. 

    Bryan, L.K. and Vinchur, A.J. (2025). Key thinkers in industrial and organisational psychology. London: Routledge. 

    Endrejat, P. C., & Burnes, B. (2022). Kurt Lewin’s ideas are alive! But why doesn’t anybody recognize them? Theory & Psychology, 32(6), 931-952. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221118652 

    Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton, Eds.). University of Massachusetts Press. 

    Havoc, R. C., & Woody, W. D. (2025). The shrouded self: Racial passing as a tool of survival in early 20th century psychology. History of Psychology, 28(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000277 

    Hodgetts, D., Sonn, C., Li, W., & Groot, S. (2020). What does Theory & Psychology have to offer community-orientated psychologists? Theory & Psychology, 30(6), 852-863. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320947821 

    Hollway, W. (2016). Efficiency and welfare: Industrial psychology at Rowntree’s Cocoa Works. Theory & Psychology3(3), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354393033002 

    Luks, T. (2020). Building the ‘House of Industry’: Factory Citizenship and Gendered Spaces at Cadbury’s and Rowntree’s. Labour History Review 85,(3), 233-252. https://www.liverpooluniversitypress.co.uk/doi/10.3828/lhr.2020.10 

    Rose, N. S. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self (2nd ed). Free Association Books. 

    Schmidt, M. A. (2017). Planes of phenomenological experience: The psychology of deafness as an early example of American Gestalt psychology, 1928–1940. History of Psychology, 20(4), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000074 

    Vinchur, A. J. (2018). The early years of industrial and organizational psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  • Chapter 13 – Key Readings

    Barham, P. (2004). Forgotten lunatics of the Great War. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press 

    Brunner, J. (1991), Psychiatry, psychoanalysis, and politics during the First World War. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences27(4), 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199110)27:4<352::AID-JHBS2300270404>3.0.CO;2-9 

    Carden-Coyne, A. (2014). The politics of wounds: Military patients and medical power in the First World War. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

    Downing, T. (2016). Breakdown: The crisis of shell shock on the Somme, 1916. London: Little, Brown.  

    Jones, E. (2018). Trans-generational transmission of traumatic memory and moral injury. Military Behavioral Health, 6(2), 134–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/21635781.2018.1454362 

    Jones, E., & Wessely, S. (2005). Shell shock to PTSD: Military psychiatry from 1900 to the Gulf War. Psychology Press. 

    Leuenberger, C. (2003), Beyond invisible walls: The psychological legacy of Soviet trauma. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 39(2), 183-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.10071 

    Mather, R., & Marsden, J. (2004). Trauma and temporality: On the origins of post-traumatic stress. Theory & Psychology, 14(2), 205-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354304042017 

    Shephard, B. (2001). A war of nerves: Soldiers and psychiatrists in the twentieth century. Harvard University Press. 

    Showalter, E. (1987). The female malady: Women, madness and English culture, 1830–1980. Virago. 

    Trembinski, D. (2011). Comparing premodern melancholy/mania and modern trauma: An argument in favor of historical experiences of trauma. History of Psychology, 14(1), 80–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020430 

    Zait, J. (2024). “I’m not a person anymore”: The “survivor syndrome” and William G. Niederland’s perception of the human being. History of Psychology, 27(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000250

  • Chapter 12 – Key Readings

    Bangham, J. (2015). What Is Race? UNESCO, mass communication and human genetics in the early 1950s. History of the Human Sciences, 28(5), 80-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695115600581 

    Beccalossi, C., Fisher, K., & Funke, J. (2023). Sexology and development. History of the Human Sciences, 36(5), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231213970 

    Broberg, G., & Roll-Hansen, N. (2005). Eugenics and the welfare state: Sterilization policy in Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland. Michigan State University Press. 

    Germann, P. (2021). Race in post-war science: The Swiss case in a global context. History of the Human Sciences, 35(1), 216-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211010385 

    Jarska, N., Lišková, K., & Wahl, M. (2024). Early state socialism and eugenics: Premarital medical certificates in Czechoslovakia, East Germany, and Poland in the aftermath of World War II. History of the Human Sciences, 38(1), 51-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241270931 

    Kelly, E., Manning, D. T., Boye, S., Rice, C., Owen, D., Stonefish, S., & Stonefish, M. (2021). Elements of a counter-exhibition: Excavating and countering a Canadian history and legacy of eugenics. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 57(1), 12–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22081 

    Kevles, D. J. (1985). In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. Harvard University Press. 

    Lombardo, P. A. (2022). Three generations, no imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Johns Hopkins University Press. 

    Pilgrim, D. (2023). Verdicts on Hans Eysenck and the fluxing context of British psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 36(3-4), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221143888 

    Sims-Schouten, W. (2021). ‘A troublesome girl is pushed through’: Morality, biological determinism, resistance, resilience, and the Canadian child migration schemes, 1883–1939. History of the Human Sciences, 35(1), 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211036553 

    Stern, A. M. (2016). Eugenic nation: Faults and frontiers of better breeding in modern America (Second edition). University of California Press. 

    Teicher, A. (2022). How family charts became Mendelian: The changing content of pedigrees and its impact on the consolidation of genetic theory. History of the Human Sciences, 37(3-4), 85-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221107558 

    Weizmann, F. (2010), From the ‘Village of a Thousand Souls’ to ‘Race Crossing in Jamaica’: Arnold Gesell, eugenics and child development. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 46(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20440 

  • Chapter 10 – Key Readings

    Adams, M. (2020). The kingdom of dogs: Understanding Pavlov’s experiments as human–animal relationships. Theory & Psychology30(1), 121-141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319895597 

    Brantz, D. (2010). Beastly natures: Animals, humans, and the study of history. University of Virginia Press. 

    Gillaspy, J.A., Jr., Brinegar, J.L. & Bailey, R.E. (2014). Operant psychology makes a splash—in marine mammal training (1955–1965). Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences., 50(3), 231-248. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21664 

    Godfrey-Smith, P. (2016). Other minds: The octopus, the sea, and the deep origins of consciousness. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 

    Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.  

    Haraway, D. J. (2003). The companion species manifesto: Dogs, people, and significant otherness. Prickly Paradigm Press. 

    Kirk, R. G. W. (2014). In dogs we trust? Intersubjectivity, response-able relations, and the making of mine detector dogs. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 50(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21642 

    Linge, I. (2020). The potency of the butterfly: The reception of Richard B. Goldschmidt’s animal experiments in German sexology around 1920. History of the Human Sciences, 34(1), 40-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695119890545 

    Smuts. (2001). Encounters with animal minds. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5/7), 293–309. 

    Sorabji, R. (1993).  Animal minds and human morals: the origins of the Western debate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.  

    Wilson, D. (2001). ‘A ‘precipitous dégringolade’ The uncertain progress of British comparative psychology in the twentieth century.’ In G.C. Bunn, A.D. Lovie & G. Richards, (Eds.), Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections. British Psychological Society. 

  • Chapter 11 – Key Readings

    Braat, M., Engelen, J., van Gemert, T., & Verhaegh, S. (2020). The rise and fall of behaviorism: The narrative and the numbers. History of Psychology, 23(3), 252–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000146 

    Clark, D. O. (2023). A Science of adaptation: The transnational origins of the American functional behaviorism of the 20th century. Revista de Historia de la Psicología, 44(3), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.5093/rhp2023a10 

    Green, C. D., Feinerer, I. & Burman, J. T. (2013), Beyond the Schools of Psychology 1: A digital analysis of Psychological Review, 1894–1903. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 49(2), 167-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21592 

    Harris, B. (2011). Letting go of little Albert: Disciplinary memory, history, and the uses of myth. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 47(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20470 

    Kontopodis, M., & Jackowska, M. (2019). De-centring the psychology curriculum: Diversity, social justice, and psychological knowledge. Theory & Psychology, 29(4), 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319858419 

    Link, A. (2016), Documenting human nature: E. Richard Sorenson and the National Anthropological Film Centre, 1965–1980. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 52(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21813 

    Ian Lubek, I. & Apfelbaum, E. (1987). Neo‑behaviourism and the Garcia effect: A social psychology of science approach to the history of a paradigm clash. In M. G. Ash & W. R. Woodward (Eds.), Psychology in TwentiethCentury Thought and Science (pp. 59‑91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Murray, S.O. (1988), W. I. Thomas, behaviourist ethnologist. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 24(4), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198810)24:4<381::AID-JHBS2300240405>3.0.CO;2-K 

    O’Neil, W. M. (1995). American behaviorism: A historical and critical analysis. Theory & Psychology, 5(2), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395052008 

    O’Donohue, W., Ferguson, K. E., & Naugle, A. E. (2003). The structure of the cognitive revolution: An examination from the philosophy of science. The Behavior Analyst, 26(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392069

    Prilleltensky, I. (1994). On the social legacy of B.F. Skinner: Rhetoric of change, philosophy of adjustment. Theory & Psychology, 4(1), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354394041006 

    Rutherford, A. (2009). Beyond the box: B.F. Skinner’s technology of behaviour from laboratory to life, 1950s-1970s. University of Toronto Press.  

    Torracinta, S. (2022). Maps of desire: Edward Tolman’s drive theory of wants*. History of the Human Sciences, 36(1), 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221135852 

  • Chapter 3 – Key Readings

    Fitzgerald, D. (2019). What was sociology? History of the Human Sciences32(1), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695118808935 

    Gurley, J. R. (2009). A history of changes to the criminal personality in the DSM. History of Psychology, 12(4), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018101 

    Hacking, I. (2007). Kinds of people: Moving targetsProceedings of the British Academy, 151, 285–318. https://doi.org/10.5871/bacad/9780197264249.003.0010 

    Hofman, E. (2022). A useful science: Criminal interrogation and the turn to psychology in Germany around 1800. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 58(3), 319–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22193 

    Karstedt, S. (2007). Explorations into the sociology of criminal justice and punishment: Leaving the modernist project behind. History of the Human Sciences20(2), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695107076199 

    Kellor, F. (1899). Experimental sociology: Descriptive and analytical. New York: Macmillan. 

    King, A. (2006). Serial killing and the postmodern self. History of the Human Sciences19(3), 109-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695106066544 

    Lišková, K., & Moravanská, L. (2021). From class origins to individual psychopathology: Spousal murder according to state socialist Czechoslovak criminology. History of the Human Sciences, 35(3-4), 237-259. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211027724 

    Lombroso, C. (1876/2006). Criminal man. (M. Gibson & N. Rafter, Trans.). Durham, NC: Duke University Press. 

    Molina, J. (2024). British criminology, undercover policing, and racist attacks: Notes on the ‘law and order’ information infrastructure. History of the Human Sciences38(2), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241278590 

    Rafter, N. (1997). Creating born criminals. Urbana: University of Illinois Press. 

    Rose, N. (2010). ‘Screen and intervene’: governing risky brains. History of the Human Sciences23(1), 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695109352415 

  • Chapter 4 – Key Readings

    Brinkmann, S. (2005). Human kinds and looping effects in psychology: Foucauldian and hermeneutic perspectives. Theory & Psychology15(6), 769-791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354305059332 

    Csányi, G. (2025), Demography, pleasure, state, and market in socialist sexology: Medical-sexological and sexual-psychological public discourse in socialist Hungary through counselling books from a social-political perspective. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences61(1): e70015. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.70015 

    Fischer, N., & Seidman, S. (2016). Introducing the new sexuality studies : 3rd edition (Third edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 

    Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality. Vol. 1, The will to knowledge. Penguin.  

    Hacking, I. (1986). Making up people. In T.C. Heller, M. Sosna & D.E. Wellbery (Eds.), Reconstructing individualism: Autonomy, Individuality and the self in Western thought (pp.222-236). Stanford: Stanford University Press.  

    Hacking, I. (1995). The looping effects of human kinds. In Sperber, D., Premack, D., & Premack, A. J. (Eds), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate. Clarendon Press. 

    Healy-Cullen, S., & Morison, T. (2024). Extending sexual scripting theory through critical discursive psychology: An analytical approach to explore the performance of sexual identities. Theory & Psychology34(6), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241282330 

    Leng, K. (2015). The personal is scientific: Women, gender, and the production of sexological knowledge in Germany and Austria, 1900–1931. History of Psychology, 18(3), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039519 

    Leng, K., & Sutton, K. (2020). Histories of sexology today: Reimagining the boundaries of scientia sexualisHistory of the Human Sciences34(1), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120927172 

    Marrow, E. (2023). “Why should other people be the judge”: The codification of assessment criteria for gender-affirming care, 1970s–1990s. History of Psychology26(3), 210–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000238 

    McCarthy, T. (1981), Freud and the problem of sexuality. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 17: 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198107)17:3<332::AID-JHBS2300170304>3.0.CO;2-I 

    Rutherford, A., & Pettit, M. (2015). Feminism and/in/as psychology: The public sciences of sex and gender. History of Psychology, 18(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039533 

    Weeks, J. (2009). Sexuality (3rd ed). Routledge. 

  • Chapter 5 – Key Readings

    Arnaud, S. (2015). On hysteria: The invention of a medical category between 1670 & 1820. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 

    Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895/2004). Studies on Hysteria (N. Luckhurst, Trans.).  

    de Marneffe, D. (1991). Looking and listening: the construction of clinical knowledge in Charcot and Freud. Signs, 17(1), 71–111. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3174446

    Hajek, K. M. (2021). Félida, doubled personality, and the ‘normal state’ in late 19th-century French psychology. History of the Human Sciences34(2), 66-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120980648 

    Hustvedt, A. (2011). Medical muses: Hysteria in nineteenth-century Paris. Bloomsbury. 

    Kanaan, R. A. A., & Wessely, S. C. (2010). The origins of factitious disorder. History of the Human Sciences23(2), 68-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695109357128 

    Kimball, M. M. (2000). From “Anna O.” to Bertha Pappenheim: Transforming private pain into public action. History of Psychology3(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.3.1.20 

    Kovalets, A. (2025), Hysteria and the birth of the new. British Journal of Psychotherapy41(2), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjp.12953 

    Micale, M. S. (1995). Approaching hysteria: Disease and its interpretations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 

    Ropper, A.H., & and Burrell, B.D. (2020). How the brain lost its mind: Sex, hysteria, and the riddle of mental illness.  London: Atlantic Books. 

    Scull, A. (2009). Hysteria: The biography. Oxford University Press. 

    Showalter, E. (1985). The female malady: Women, madness and English culture, 1830–1980. Virago. 

  • Chapter 6 – Key Readings

    Benschop, R., & Draaisma, D. (2000). In pursuit of precision: The calibration of minds and machines in late nineteenth-century psychology. Annals of Science, 57(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/000337900296281 

    Bringmann, L. F., & Eronen, M. I. (2015). Heating up the measurement debate: What psychologists can learn from the history of physics. Theory & Psychology, 26(1), 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315617253 

    Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.  

    Evrard, R., Gumpper, S., Beauvais, B., & Alvarado C. S. (2021). “Never sacrifice anything to laboratory work”: The “physiological psychology” of Charles Richet (1875–1905). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences. 57(2), 172–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22086 

    Galton, F. (1885). On the Anthropometric Laboratory at the Late International Health Exhibition. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 14, 205-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/2841978 

    Hasselman, F. (2023). Going round in squares: Theory-based measurement requires a theory of measurement. Theory & Psychology, 33(1), 145-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221131511 

    Michell, J. (2005). Measurement in psychology: A critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Michell, J. (2021). “The art of imposing measurement upon the mind”: Sir Francis Galton and the genesis of the psychometric paradigm. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211017671 

    Saint-Mont, U. (2012). What measurement is all about. Theory & Psychology, 22(4), 467-485. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429997 

  • Chapter 7 – Key Readings

    Colombo, M. (2020). Who is the “other”? Epistemic violence and discursive practices. Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 399-404. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320923758 

    Elgaard Jensen, T. (2019). Exploring the knowledge practices of psychology: Reflections on a field study. Theory & Psychology, 29(4), 466-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319853630 

    Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599. 

    Held, B. S. (2019). Epistemic violence in psychological science: Can knowledge of, from, and for the (othered) people solve the problem? Theory & Psychology, 30(3), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319883943 

    Herle, A., and Rowse, S. Eds. (1998). Cambridge and the Torres Strait: centenary essays on the 1898 anthropological expedition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Kontopodis, M., & Jackowska, M. (2019). De-centring the psychology curriculum: Diversity, social justice, and psychological knowledge. Theory & Psychology29(4), 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319858419 

    Kvale, S. (2003). The church, the factory and the market: Scenarios for psychology in a postmodern age. Theory & Psychology, 13(5), 579–603. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543030135005 

    Lehmbrock, V. (2025). From intellectual imperialism to open system: Reassessing the “Americanization” of social psychology through Festinger’s frustration with the SSRC’s project on transnational social psychology. History of Psychology28(2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000274 

    Pouw, W. T. J. L., & Looren de Jong, H. (2015). Rethinking situated and embodied social psychology. Theory & Psychology25(4), 411-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315585661 

    Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics and society in England, 1869–1939. Routledge & Kegan Paul. 

    Shephard, B. (2014). Headhunters: The search for a science of the mind. London: the Bodley Head.  Ward, T., Sullivan, J., & Durrant, R. (2024). Epistemic disagreement in psychopathology research and practice: A procedural model. Theory & Psychology, 34(4), 484-507. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241263806

  • Chapter 8 – Key Readings

    Draaisma, D. (2000). Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni9versity Press. 

    Green, C.D. (2019). Where did Freud’s iceberg metaphor of mind come from? History of Psychology, 22(4), 369-372. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000135_b 

    Harris, B. (2021). Eugenics, social reform, and psychology: The careers of Isabelle Kendig. History of Psychology24(4), 350–376. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000200 

    Johnston, E., & Johnson, A. (2017). Balancing life and work by unbending gender: Early American women psychologists’ struggles and contributions. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences53(3), 246–264. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21862 

    Knowles, E. S., & Sibicky, M. E. (1990). Continuity and diversity in the stream of selves: Metaphorical resolutions of William James’s one-in-many-selves paradox. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin16(4), 676-687. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167290164008 

    Leary, D. E. (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Leary, D. E. (1992). William James and the art of human understanding. American Psychologist, 47(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.152 

    Richards, G. (1991). James and Freud: Two masters of metaphor. British Journal of Psychology, 82(2), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1991.tb02395.x 

    Ruck, N., Luckgei, V., Rothmüller, B., Franke, N., & Rack, E. (2022). Psychologization in and through the women’s movement: A transnational history of the psychologization of consciousness-raising in the German-speaking countries and the United States. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences58(3), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22187 

    Rutherford, A. (2017). “Making better use of U.S. women”: Psychology, sex roles, and womanpower in post-WWII America. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences53(3), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21861 

    Soyland, A.J. (1994). Psychology as metaphor. Sage. 

    Sullivan, P. (2017). Towards a literary account of mental health from James’ Principles of PsychologyNew Ideas in Psychology, 46, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2016.02.003  

  • Chapter 9 – Key Readings

    Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Sage. 

    Fancher, R. E. (1998). Biography and psychodynamic theory: Some lessons from the life of Francis Galton. History of Psychology1(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.1.2.99 

    Franz, D. J. (2021). “Are psychological attributes quantitative?” is not an empirical question: Conceptual confusions in the measurement debate. Theory & Psychology, 32(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211045340 

    Michell, J. (2005). Measurement in psychology: Critical history of a methodological concept. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Michell, J. (2021). “The art of imposing measurement upon the mind”: Sir Francis Galton and the genesis of the psychometric paradigm. Theory & Psychology, 32(3), 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211017671 

    Richardson, K. (2002). What IQ Tests Test. Theory & Psychology12(3), 283-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354302012003012 

    Richardson, K. (2017). Genes, brains, and human potential: The science and ideology of intelligence. Columbia University Press. 

    Schregel, S. (2020). ‘The intelligent and the rest’: British Mensa and the contested status of high intelligence. History of the Human Sciences33(5), 12-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120970029 

    Wackers, G. (2025). Digital phenotyping of the mind: From biology to psychoinformatics. Theory & Psychology35(2), 141-162. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543251322116 

    Williams, R. L. (1972). The BITCH-100: A culture-specific test. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention.  Winston, A. S. (2018). Neoliberalism and IQ: Naturalizing economic and racial inequality. Theory & Psychology28(5), 600-618. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318798160

  • Chapter 36 – Key Readings

    Boynton, D. M., & Smith, L. D. (2006). Bringing history to life: Simulating landmark experiments in psychology. History of Psychology, 9(2), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.9.2.113 

    Broere, S. (2019). Picturing ethnopsychology: A colonial psychiatrist’s struggles to examine Javanese minds, 1910–1925. History of Psychology, 22(3), 266–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000094 

    De Vos, J. (2011). Depsychologizing Torture. Critical Inquiry, 37(2), 286–314. https://doi.org/10.1086/657294 

    Di Castri, T. (2023). The settler colonial roots and neoliberal afterlife of Problem Behaviour Theory. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 59(2), 107–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22218 

    Drumm, P. (2018). Australian fantasy revisited. History of Psychology, 21(3), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000099 

    Fisher, A., & Abram, D. (2013). Radical ecopsychology: psychology in the service of life (2nd edition). SUNY Press. 

    Henrich, J. P. (2020). The WEIRDest people in the world: how the West became psychologically peculiar and particularly prosperous. Picador: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. 

    Lazard, L. & McAvoy, J. (2020). Doing reflexivity in psychological research: What’s the point? What’s the practice?, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 17(2), 159-177, https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2017.1400144 

    Leys, R. (2024). Anatomy of a train wreck: The rise and fall of priming research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

    Moghaddam, F. M. (2023). How psychologists failed: we neglected the poor and minorities, favored the rich and privileged, and got science wrong. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071598 

    Morawski, J. (2020). Psychologists’ psychologies of psychologists in a time of crisis. History of Psychology, 23(2), 176–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000140 

    Pickren, G. W., Pickren, W. E. (2021). Signposts to decolonial futures in understanding and addressing our present crises. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 57(4), 315–318. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22147 

    Pols, H. (2007). Psychological knowledge in a colonial context: Theories on the nature of the “native mind” in the former Dutch East Indies. History of Psychology, 10(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.111 

    Sturm, T., & Mülberger, A. (2012). Crisis discussions in psychology: New historical and philosophical perspectives. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43(2), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.11.001

  • Chapter 35 – Key Readings

    Beaulieu, A. (2002). Images are not the (only) truth: Brain mapping, visual knowledge, and iconoclasm. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27(1), 53–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700103 

    Beaulieu, A. (2003). Brains, maps and the new territory of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13(4), 561-568. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543030134006 

    Choudhury, S., & Slaby, J. (2012). Critical neuroscience: A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. Wiley-Blackwell. 

    De Vos, J., & Pluth, E. Eds. (2016). Neuroscience and critique: Exploring the limits of the neurological turn. Taylor & Francis. 

    Fisher, H. (2003). Categories and embodied objects: The subjective self and the psychologist within natural psychology. Theory & Psychology, 13(2), 239-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354303013002004 

    Hayles, N. K., & Pulizzi, J. J. (2010). Narrating consciousness: Language, media and embodiment. History of the Human Sciences, 23(3), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110363646  

    Hennig, B. (2010). Science, conscience, consciousness. History of the Human Sciences, 23(3), 15-28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110363353  

    Kügler, P. (2012). The ever-shifting problem of consciousness. Theory & Psychology, 23(1), 46-59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354312457112 

    Liu, J., & Huo, Y. (2020). Recent advances in research on the association between consciousness and unconsciousness in China. Theory & Psychology, 30(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319895807 

    Mills J (2019). The myth of the collective unconscious. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 55(1) 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21945 

    Noë, A. (2010). Out of our heads: Why you are not your brain, and other lessons from the biology of consciousness. Hill & Wang. 

    Nye, D. E. (2007). American technological sublime. MIT Press. 

    Tallis, R. (2016). Aping mankind: neuromania, Darwinitis and the misrepresentation of humanity. Routledge.  Žižek, S. (2023). Hegel in a wired brain. Bloomsbury Academic.

  • Chapter 34 – Key Readings

    Chakrabarty, N., Roberts, L., & Preston, J. (2014). Critical race theory in England. Routledge. 

    Delgado, R., Harris, A., & Stefancic, J. (2023). Critical Race TheoryAn Introduction. (4th Edition). New York University Press.  

    Fielder, T. (2021). Psychoanalysis and anti-racism in mid-20th-century America: An alternative angle of vision. History of the Human Sciences, 35(3-4), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211042784 

    Flack, C. E., Whipple, C. R., & Robinson, W. L. (2025). A social-contextual analysis of African American adolescents’ coping self-efficacy. School Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000709 

    Hochman, A. (2025). The race illusion: on the reality of racialization and the myth of race. Oxford University Press. 

    Jones, R. L. (2004). Black psychology (4th ed). Cobb & Henry Publishers. 

    Nobles, W. W. (2006). Seeking the sakhu: Foundational writings for an African psychology (1st ed). Third World Press. 

    Nwoye, A. (2017). African psychology and the emergence of the Madiban tradition. Theory & Psychology, 28(1), 38-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317742204  

    Oppong, S. (2022). Indigenous psychology in Africa: Centrality of culture, misunderstandings, and global positioning. Theory & Psychology, 32(6), 953-973. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221097334  

    Pettit, M. (2024). The racial economy of psychological care: Professionalism, social justice, and political action during american psychology’s communitarian moment. History of Psychology, 27(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000259 

    Pettit, M. (2022). “Angela’s psych squad”: Black psychology against the American carceral state in the 1970s. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 58, 365–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22216 

    Richards, G. (1997). ‘Race’, racism, and psychology: Towards a reflexive history. Routledge. 

    Sawyer, T. F. (2000). Francis Cecil Sumner: His views and influence on African American higher education. History of Psychology, 3(2), 122–141. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.3.2.122 

    Wynter, R., Campbell, N., Chaney, S., & Marks, S. (2025). The persistence of history: Racism, anti-Blackness, and the causes of mental ill health, c.1800–2020. History of the Human Sciences, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951251331378

  • Chapter 24 – Key Readings

    Amouroux, R., Gerber, L., & Aronov, M. (2022). Putting psychotherapy in its place: The regionalization of behaviour therapy in France, Switzerland, and Belgium, 1960s–1990s. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 58(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22142 

    De Vos, J. (2013). Psychologization and the subject of late modernity. Palgrave Macmillan. 

    Felder, A. J., & Robbins, B. D. (2011). A cultural-existential approach to therapy: Merleau-Ponty’s phenomenology of embodiment and its implications for practice. Theory & Psychology, 21(3), 355-376. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310397570  

    Han, S. (2014). The illusion of autonomy: Locating humanism in existential-psychoanalytic social theory. History of the Human Sciences, 28(1), 66-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114551655  

    Harrist, S., & Richardson, F. C. (2012). Levinas and hermeneutics on ethics and the Other. Theory & Psychology, 22(3), 342-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354310389647 

    Hîncu, A. (2022). Social science and Marxist humanism beyond collectivism in Socialist Romania. History of the Human Sciences, 35(2), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211069491 

    Loewenthal, D. (2015). Critical psychotherapy, psychoanalysis and counselling: Implications for practice. Palgrave Macmillan. 

    Malone, K. R. (2007). The Subject as drop-out: cultural accountability and the ethics of psychoanalysis and humanistic psychology. Theory & Psychology, 17(3), 449-471. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307077291 

    Marks, S. (2017). Psychotherapy in historical perspective. History of the Human Sciences, 30(2), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117703243 

    Mather, R. (2008). Hegel, Dostoyevsky and Carl Rogers: Between humanism and spirit. History of the Human Sciences, 21(1), 33-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695107086151 

    Rennie, D. L. (2000). Grounded theory methodology as methodical hermeneutics: Reconciling realism and relativism. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 481-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104003 

    Rowan, J. (2001). Ordinary ecstasy: The dialectics of humanistic psychology (Third edition). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787794 

    Totton, N. (2010). The problem with humanistic therapies. Karnac.  Wharne, S. (2020). How is distress understood in existential philosophies and can phenomenological therapeutic practices be “evidence-based”? Theory & Psychology, 31(2), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320964586

  • Chapter 33 – Key Readings

    Beccalossi, C. (2020). Types, norms, and normalisation: Hormone research and treatments in Italy, Argentina, and Brazil, c. 1900–50. History of the Human Sciences, 34(2), 113-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120941193 

    Drescher, J. (2015). Out of DSM: Depathologizing homosexuality. Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 565-575. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5040565 

    Ellis, S. J. (2025). Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, intersex, and queer psychology an introduction (Third edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Hegarty, P. (2018). A recent history of lesbian and gay psychology: from homophobia to LGBT. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.  

    Hubbard, K. A., & Griffiths, D. A. (2019). Sexual offence, diagnosis, and activism: A British history of LGBTQIA+ psychology. American Psychologist, 74(8), 940-953. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000544 

    Jones, R. M. (2023). Defeating the ‘social danger’ of homosexuality while ‘forging the fatherland’: Sexual science and biotypology in Mexico’s national development, 1927–57. History of the Human Sciences, 36(5), 122-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231199581 

    Minton, H. L. (1997). Queer Theory: Historical Roots and Implications for Psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7(3), 337-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354397073003 

    Rivers, I., & Ward, R. (2012). Out of the ordinary: representations of LGBT lives. Cambridge Scholars Pub. 

    Russell, G. M., & Bohan, J. S. (2006). The case of internalized homophobia: Theory and/as practice. Theory & Psychology, 16(3), 343-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354306064283 

    Sutton, K. (2020). Kinsey and the psychoanalysts: Cross-disciplinary knowledge production in post-war US sex research. History of the Human Sciences, 34(1), 120-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120911597 

    Taavetti, R. (2024). Low on the Kinsey scale: Homosexuality in Swedish and Finnish sex research, 1960s–1990s. History of the Human Sciences, 37(5), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241245040 

    Vasilovsky, A. T. (2018). Aesthetic as genetic: The epistemological violence of gaydar research. Theory & Psychology, 28(3), 298-318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318764826 

    Weinstein, D. (2018). Sexuality, therapeutic culture, and family ties in the United States after 1973. History of Psychology, 21(3), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000043 

    Woodman, D. (2023). LGBT+ Communities: Creating Spaces of Identity. IntechOpen. 

  • Chapter 32 – Key Readings

    Bookwala, J., & Newton, N. J. (2022). Reflections from pioneering women in psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Burman, E. (2016). Fanon, Foucault, feminisms: Psychoeducation, theoretical psychology, and political change. Theory & Psychology, 26(6), 706-730. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316653484 

    Dennis PM. (2020) Bishop Fulton J. Sheen: America’s public critic of psychoanalysis, 1947–1957. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 56(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22000 

    Dhar, A. (2020). Psychology: A discipline in trouble and trouble in the discipline. Theory & Psychology, 31(2), 310-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320945795 

    Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. American Psychologist, 43(6), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.43.6.455 

    Hubbard, K., & Hegarty, P. (2024). A feminist companion to conceptual and historical issues in psychology. Open University Press. 

    Kim, S., & Rutherford, A. (2015). From seduction to sexism: Feminists challenge the ethics of therapist–client sexual relations in 1970s America. History of Psychology, 18(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039524 

    Maass, V. S. (2023). Feminist psychology: History, practice, research, and the future. Praeger. 

    Meijer, M. (2022). Making therapy more transparent: On Kevin R. Smith’s therapeutic ethics. Theory & Psychology, 33(3), 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221131271  

    Rutherford, A. (2021). Psychology at the intersections of gender, feminism, history, and culture. Cambridge University Press. 

    Rutherford, A., Vaughn-Blount, K., & Ball, L. C. (2010). Responsible opposition, Disruptive voices: science, social change, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 460–473. 

    Spandler, H., & Carr, S. (2022). Lesbian and bisexual women’s experiences of aversion therapy in England. History of the Human Sciences, 35(3-4), 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211059422  

    Stupak, R., & Dyga, K. (2018). Postpsychiatry and postmodern psychotherapy: Theoretical and ethical issues in mental health care in a Polish context. Theory & Psychology, 28(6), 780-799. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318802973 

  • Chapter 30 – Key Readings

    Becker, D., & Marecek, J. (2008). Positive psychology: History in the remaking? Theory & Psychology, 18(5), 591-604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308093397 

    Binkley, S. (2014). Happiness as enterprise: An essay on neoliberal life. State University of New York. 

    Cabanas, E. (2018). Positive Psychology and the legitimation of individualism. Theory & Psychology, 28(1), 3-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317747988 

    Christopher, J. C., & Hickinbottom, S. (2008). Positive psychology, ethnocentrism, and the disguised ideology of individualism. Theory & Psychology18(5), 563-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354308093396 

    Davidson, I. J. (2025). Well-being at the cost of welfare: Learned helplessness and responsibility in positive psychology and American policy. History of the Human Sciences, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951251336898 

    De La Fabián, R., & Stecher, A. (2017). Positive psychology’s promise of happiness: A new form of human capital in contemporary neoliberal governmentality. Theory & Psychology, 27(5), 600-621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317718970 

    De La Fabián, R., & Stecher, A. (2018). Positive psychology and the enhancement of happiness: A reply to Binkley (2018). Theory & Psychology, 28(3), 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354318772098 

    Graiver, I. (2021). A historical perspective on mental health: Proposal for a dialogue between history and psychology. History of Psychology, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000139 

    Jackson, M. (2012). The pursuit of happiness: The social and scientific origins of Hans Selye’s natural philosophy of life. History of the Human Sciences, 25(5), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112468526 

    Martínez-Guzmán, A., & Lara, A. (2019). Affective modulation in positive psychology’s regime of happiness. Theory & Psychology, 29(3), 336-357. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319845138 

    Núñez, G. (2024). Felizes por enquanto: Escritos sobre outros mundos possíveis. Planeta. 

    Raffnsøe, S., Rosenberg, A., Beaulieu, A., Binkley, S., Kristensen, J. E., Opitz, S., Rabinowitz, M., & Holm, D. V. (2009). Neoliberal governmentality. Foucault Studies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.22439/fs.v0i0.2464 

    Sewaybricker, L. E., & Massola, G. M. (2022). Against well-being: A critique of positive psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 36(1), 131-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221114733 

    Watters, E. (2010). Crazy like us: The globalization of the American psyche. Free Press. 

  • Chapter 29 – Key Readings

    Arrigo, J. M., Rockwood, L. P., O’Brien, J., Franz, D., DeBatto, D., & Kiriakou, J. (2022). A military/intelligence operational perspective on the American Psychological Association’s weaponization of psychology post-9/11. History of the Human Sciences, 35(5), 51-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221121711 

    Baddeley, A.D. (2001). ‘Memories of memory research’. In G.C. Bunn, A.D. Lovie and G.D. Richards, (Eds.), Psychology in Britain: Historical essays and personal reflections, (pp.344-352). BPS Books/Wiley. 

    Bloor, D. (2025). The Cambridge Cockpit and the paradoxes of fatigue, 1940-1977. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 

    Chen, W., Ping, X., & Dong, D. (2023). Filling in the vacuous flesh: Embodiment, constitution, and interoception. Theory & Psychology, 33(4), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231169967 

    Coulter, J. (2008). Twenty-five theses against cognitivism. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(2), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407086789 

    Danziger, K. (1990). Generative metaphor and the history of psychological discourse. In D. J. Leary (Ed.), Metaphors in the history of psychology (pp.331-356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Draaisma, D. (2000). Metaphors of memory: A history of ideas about the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Hampe, B. (2017). Metaphor: embodied cognition and discourse. Cambridge University Press. 

    Jackson, P. (2022). Theorising embodied interaction in coaching: A Merleau-Pontian perspective on embodied practice. Theory & Psychology, 33(1), 78-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221123970 

    Jones, E. (2012). ‘The gut war’: Functional somatic disorders in the UK during the Second World War. History of the Human Sciences, 25(5), 30-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112466515 

    Kölbl, C. (2023). Klaus Holzkamp smiled: Soviet psychology in the Federal Republic of Germany in the Cold War era. History of Psychology, 26(4), 314–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000243 

    Ma, H. L., Dawson, M. R. W., Prinsen, R. S., & Hayward, D. A. (2022). Embodying cognitive ethology. Theory & Psychology, 33(1), 42-58. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221126165 

    Nietzel, B. (2016). Propaganda, psychological warfare and communication research in the USA and the Soviet Union during the Cold War. History of the Human Sciences, 29(4-5), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695116667881 

    Randall, W. (2007). From computer to compost: Rethinking our metaphors for memory. Theory & Psychology, 17(5), 611–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354307081619 

    Sampson, E. E. (1996). Establishing Embodiment in Psychology. Theory & Psychology, 6(4), 601-624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354396064004 

    Wu, H. Y.-J. (2020). Psychiatrists’ agency and their distance from the authoritarian state in post-World War II Taiwan. History of Psychology, 23(4), 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000174 

  • Chapter 28 – Key Readings

    Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (Second edition). Edinburgh University Press. 

    Dixon, T. (2003). From passions to emotions: The creation of a secular psychological category. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

    Dupouy, S. (2011), The naturalist and the nuances: Sentimentalism, moral values, and emotional expression in Darwin and the anatomistsJournal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 47(4), 335-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20515 

    Hutchinson, P. (2020). The “placebo” paradox and the emotion paradox: Challenges to psychological explanation. Theory & Psychology, 30(5), 617-637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320928139 

    Larrain, A., & Haye, A. (2020). The dialogical and political nature of emotions: A reading of Vygotsky’s The Psychology of ArtTheory & Psychology, 30(6), 800-812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320955235 

    Loaiza, J. R. (2025). Cultural variation of emotions and radical relativism. Theory & Psychology, 35(4), 444-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543251332575 

    Malekzad, F., Jais, M., Hernandez, G., Kehr, H., & Quirin, M. (2022). Not self-aware? Psychological antecedents and consequences of alienating from one’s actual motives, emotions, and goals. Theory & Psychology, 33(4), 463-484. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543221086598 

    Mesquita, B., Boiger, M., & De Leersnyder, J. (2017). Doing emotions: The role of culture in everyday emotions. European Review of Social Psychology, 28(1), 95–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2017.1329107 

    Perrotta, D. (2025). Affective experience in neuroscience and phenomenology: An epistemological analysis of emotions and feelings. Theory & Psychology, 35(4), 466-487. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543251336171 

    Plamper, J. (2015). History of emotions: An introduction (K. Tribe, Trans.; First edition). Oxford University Press. 

    Rose, A.C. (2012), Animal tales: Observations of the emotions in American experimental psychology, 1890–1940. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 48(4), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21562 

    Sánchez, F., & Sebastián, C. (2024). Integrating affection, emotion, and aesthetics into a General Theory of Learning. Theory & Psychology, 34(2), 233-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241229740 

    Wassmann, C. (2014), “Picturesque Incisiveness”: Explaining the Celebrity of James’s Theory of Emotion. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 50(2), 166-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.21651

    Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and Emotion: A new social science understanding. Sage.

  • Chapter 27 – Key Readings

    Chouliaraki, L., & Fairclough, N. (1999). Discourse in late modernity: Rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press. 

    Coulter, J. (1979). The social construction of mind: Studies in ethnomethodology and linguistic philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan. 

    Harré, R. (1988). Wittgenstein and artificial intelligence. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515088808572928 

    Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory & Psychology, 11(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301114006 

    Hudson, L. (1972) The cult of the fact. Cape. 

    Kalis A. (2019). No Intentions in the Brain: A Wittgensteinian Perspective on the Science of Intention. Frontiers in Psychology,10 (946) 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00946 

    Racine, T.P. & Müller, U. (2009). The contemporary relevance of Wittgenstein: Reflections and directions. New Ideas in Psychology, 27(2),107-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.04.008 

    Scott, P., & von Unger, H. (2021). Discourses on im/migrants, ethnic minorities, and infectious disease: Fifty years of tuberculosis reporting in the United Kingdom. History of the Human Sciences, 35(1), 189-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951211015886 

    Shotter, J. (1996), Living in a Wittgensteinian world: Beyond theory to a poetics of practices. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26(3), 293 311. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1996.tb00292.x 

    Standish, P. (2022). Inner and outer, psychology and Wittgenstein’s painted curtain. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 56(1), 115 123, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12656 

    van der Merwe, W. L., & Voestermans, P. P. (1995). Wittgenstein’s legacy and the challenge to psychology. Theory & Psychology5(1), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354395051002 

    Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (2015). Discourse and social psychology, postmodernism, and capitalist collusion: An argument for more complex historiographies of psychology. Theory & Psychology, 25(3), 388–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314552009 

    Willig, C. (2000). A discourse-dynamic approach to the study of subjectivity in health psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10(4), 547-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354300104006

  • Chapter 26 – Key Readings

    Alter, S. G. (2007), Race, language, and mental evolution in Darwin’s descent of man. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 43(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20238 

    Brown, G. R., & Laland, K. N. (2024). Sense and nonsense: evolutionary perspectives on human behaviour (Third edition). Oxford University Press. 

    Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Evolution and the social sciences. History of the Human Sciences, 20(2), 29-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695107076197 

    Dunbar, R. I. M., & Barrett, L. (2007). Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford University Press. 

    Fisher, K., & Funke, J. (2023). ‘All the progressive forms of life are built up on the attraction of sex’: Development and the social function of the sexual instinct in late 19th- and early 20th-century Western European sexology. History of the Human Sciences, 36(5), 42-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231208992 

    Jackson, J. P., Jr. (2023). Arthur Jensen, evolutionary biology, and racism. History of Psychology, 26(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000221 

    Jarrett, S. (2020). Consciousness reduced: The role of the ‘idiot’ in early evolutionary psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 33(5), 110-137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695120911557 

    Peters, B. M. (2013). Evolutionary psychology: Neglecting neurobiology in defining the mind. Theory & Psychology, 23(3), 305-322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313480269  

    Racine, T. P. (2021). The rhetorical use of B. F. Skinner in evolutionary psychology. Theory & Psychology, 32(1), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543211030342  

    Rose, H., & Rose, S. P. R. (2010). Alas, poor Darwin: arguments against evolutionary psychology. Vintage Digital. 

    Roughgarden, J. (2013). Evolution’s rainbow: Diversity, gender, and sexuality in nature and people. University of California Press. 

    Ruck, N. (2016). Controversies on Evolutionism: On the construction of scientific boundaries in public and internal scientific controversies about evolutionary psychology and sociobiology. Theory & Psychology, 26(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354316652968 

    Segerstrale, U. (2001). Defenders of the truth: the sociobiology debate. Oxford University Press.  Žižek, S. (1997) The plague of fantasies. London: Verso. 

  • Chapter 25 – Key Readings

    Comas-Díaz, L., & Torres Rivera, E. (2020). Liberation psychology: Theory, method, practice, and social justice. American Psychological Association. 

    Dutta, U. (2016). Prioritizing the local in an era of globalization: A proposal for decentering community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 58(3-4), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12047 

    Kagan, C., Burton, M., Duckett, P., Lawthom, R., & Siddiquee, A. (2020). Critical community psychology: Critical action and social change (Second edition). Routledge. 

    Kessi, S., Suffla, S., & Seedat, M. (2022). Decolonial enactments in community psychology. Springer. 

    Martín-Baró, I., Aron, A., & Corne, S. (1994). Writings for a liberation psychology. Harvard University Press. 

    Mills, J. A., & Harrison, T. (2007). John Rickman, Wilfred Ruprecht Bion, and the origins of the therapeutic community. History of Psychology, 10(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.10.1.22 

    Nelson, G. B., & Prilleltensky, I. (2010). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being (2nd ed). Palgrave Macmillan. 

    Parker, H. (2023). The regional survey movement and popular autoethnography in early 20th-century Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 36(3-4), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231167038 

    Pettit, M. (2024). The racial economy of psychological care: Professionalism, social justice, and political action during American psychology’s communitarian moment. History of Psychology, 27(3), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000259 

    Pols, H. (2001), Divergences in American psychiatry during the Depression: Somatic psychiatry, community mental hygiene, and social reconstruction. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 37(4), 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.1066 

    Rodkey, K. L., & Rodkey, E. N. (2020). Family, friends, and faith-communities: Intellectual community and the benefits of unofficial networks for marginalized scientists. History of Psychology, 23(4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000172 

    Sanscartier, S. (2023). Anatol Rapoport’s social responsibility: Science and antiwar activism; 1960–1970. History of Psychology, 26(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000223 

    Sonn, C. C., Fox, R., Keast, S., & Rua, M. (2022). Fostering and sustaining transnational solidarities for transformative social change: Advancing community psychology research and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 69(3-4), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12602 

    Wang, J., & Huo, Y. (2023). The diffusion of Bruner’s psychological research in China and its impact. History of Psychology, 26(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000232

  • Chapter 23 – Key Readings

    Brannigan, A. (2004). The use and misuse of the experimental method in social psychology. Routledge. 

    Brannigan, A., Nicholson, I., & Cherry, F. (2015). Introduction to the special issue: Unplugging the Milgram machine. Theory & Psychology, 25(5), 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315604408 

    De Vos, J. (2010). From Milgram to Zimbardo: the double birth of postwar psychology/psychologization. History of the Human Sciences, 23(5), 156-175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110384774 

    Drury, S., Hutchens, S. A., Shuttlesworth, D. E., & White, C. L. (2012). Philip G. Zimbardo on his career and the Stanford Prison Experiment’s 40th anniversary. History of Psychology, 15(2), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025884 

    Gibson, S. (2013). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02070.x 

    Griggs, R. A., & Whitehead, G. I. (2015). Coverage of recent criticisms of Milgram’s obedience experiments in introductory social psychology textbooks. Theory & Psychology, 25(5), 564-580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315601231 

    Herrera, C. D. (1997). A historical interpretation of deceptive experiments in American psychology. History of the Human Sciences, 10(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519701000102 

    Hoffman, E., Myerberg, N. R., & Morawski, J. G. (2015). Acting otherwise: Resistance, agency, and subjectivities in Milgram’s studies of obedience. Theory & Psychology, 25(5), 670-689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315608705 

    Manning, R., Levine, M., & Collins, A. (2007). The Kitty Genovese murder and the social psychology of helping: The parable of the 38 witnesses. American Psychologist, 62(6), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.6.555 

    Mastroianni, G. R. (2015). Obedience in perspective: Psychology and the Holocaust. Theory & Psychology, 25(5), 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354315608963 

    Perry, G. (2013). Behind the shock machine: The untold story of the notorious Milgram psychology experiments. The New Press. 

    Shotter, J. (2014). Agential realism, social constructionism, and our living relations to our surroundings: Sensing similarities rather than seeing patterns. Theory & Psychology, 24(3), 305-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354313514144 

    Šikl, R., Preiss, M., & Hoskovcová, S. (2024). Between conformity and individuality: Psychologists in Czechoslovakia during normalization (1968–1989). History of Psychology, 27(2), 178–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000254  Yanchar, S. C. (2020). Concern and control in human agency. Theory & Psychology, 31(1), 24-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354320958078

  • Chapter 22 – Key Readings

    Angel, K. (2012). Contested psychiatric ontology and feminist critique: ‘Female Sexual Dysfunction’ and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual. History of the Human Sciences, 25(4), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695112456949 

    Brinkmann, S. (2016). Toward a cultural psychology of mental disorder: The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Culture & Psychology, 22(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X15621485

    Frances, A. (2013). Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. HarperCollins. 

    Freeborn, A. (2025). Testing psychiatrists to diagnose schizophrenia: Crisis, consensus, and computers in post-war psychiatry. History of the Human Sciences, 38(2), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951241309504 

    Healy, D. (2014). Psychiatric ‘diseases’ in history. History of Psychiatry, 25(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957154X14543980 

    Kornaj, J. (2024). “It’s a fight – the whole personality of the patient to win”: The development of concepts of psychosis in the Jewish Hospital in Warsaw, 1898–1943. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 60(4), e22328. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.22328 

    Mayes, R. & Horwitz, A.V. (2005), DSM-III and the revolution in the classification of mental illness. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 41(3), 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbs.20103 

    Moncrieff, J. (2010). Psychiatric diagnosis as a political device. Social Theory and Health, 8(4), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1057/sth.2009.11 

    Moncrieff, J., & Timimi, S. (2010). Is ADHD a valid diagnosis in adults? No. British Medical Journal340, c547. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c547 

    Noll, R. (2018). Feeling and smelling psychosis: American alienism, psychiatry, prodromes and the limits of ‘category work’. History of the Human Sciences, 31(2), 22-41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695117750341 

    Pienkos, E. (2024). Understanding, schizophrenia, and the limits of phenomenology. Theory & Psychology, 34(4), 427-445. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241266618 

    Pilgrim, D. (2014). Historical resonances of the DSM-5 dispute: American exceptionalism or Eurocentrism? History of the Human Sciences, 27(2), 97-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695114527998 

    Reichardt, E. M., Stam, H. J., & Tan-MacNeill, K. (2023). “Mere guesswork”: Clarifying the role of intelligence, mentality, and psychometric testing in the diagnosis of “mental defectives” for sterilization in Alberta from 1929 to 1972. History of Psychology, 26(4), 283–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/hop0000236 

    Young, A. (2001). The harmony of illusions: Inventing post-traumatic stress disorder. Princeton University Press.  

  • Chapter 21 – Key Readings

    Brinkmann, S. (2005). Human kinds and looping effects in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 15(6), 769–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354305059332 

    Danziger, K. (1997). Naming the mind: How psychology found its language. Sage. 

    Hacking, I. (1992). Multiple personality disorder and its hosts. History of the Human Sciences, 5(2), 3-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519200500202 

    Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Harvard University Press. 

    Hacking, I. (2002). Mad travelers: Reflections on the reality of transient mental illnesses. Harvard University Press. 

    Harper, D. J. (1994). Histories of suspicion in a time of conspiracy: a reflection on Aubrey Lewis’s history of paranoia. History of the Human Sciences, 7(3), 89-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519400700304 

    Kimball, M. M. (2000). From “Anna O.” to Bertha Pappenheim: Transforming private pain into public action. History of Psychology, 3(1), 20–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/1093-4510.3.1.20 

    Knight, I. F. (1984), Freud’s “project”: A theory for Studies on Hysteria. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 20(4), 340-358. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(198410)20:4<340::AID-JHBS2300200404>3.0.CO;2-L 

    Low, K. G. (1997). Mad, but not Crazy. Theory & Psychology, 7(2), 282-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354397072014 

    Rae, G. (2025). From reason to madness and back: Critiquing reason through the Derrida–Foucault debate. History of the Human Sciences, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951251337677 

    Sass, L. A. (1994). Civilized madness: schizophrenia, self-consciousness and the modern mind. History of the Human Sciences, 7(2), 83-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/095269519400700206 

    Smith, R. (2005). The history of psychological categories. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 36(1), 55–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.12.006 

  • Chapter 31 – Key Readings

    Alparone, D., Pozzetti, R., & Rizzo, A. (2024). Sexuality in the digital world: Treatment of a case of dating app addiction. Theory & Psychology, 34(5), 630-645. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241268499 

    Bauman, Z. (2003). Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Polity Press. 

    Belli, S., Harré, R. & íñiguez, L. (2010). What is love? Discourse about emotions in social sciences. Human Affairs20(3), 249-270. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10023-010-0026-8 

    Burge. (2018). The rough guide to love: Romance, history and sexualization in gendered relationship advice. Journal of Gender Studies, 27(6), 649–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2017.1287065 

    Chiang, H. H. (2010). Liberating sex, knowing desire: scientia sexualis and epistemic turning points in the history of sexuality. History of the Human Sciences, 23(5), 42-69. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695110378947 

    Domínguez, G. E., Pujol, J., Motzkau, J. F., & Popper, M. (2017). Suspended transitions and affective orderings: From troubled monogamy to liminal polyamory. Theory & Psychology, 27(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354317700289 

    Fisher, K., & Funke, J. (2023). ‘All the progressive forms of life are built up on the attraction of sex’: Development and the social function of the sexual instinct in late 19th- and early 20th-century Western European sexology. History of the Human Sciences, 36(5), 42-67. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951231208992 

    Garlen, J. C., & Sandlin, J. A. (2017). Happily (n)ever after: the cruel optimism of Disney’s romantic ideal. Feminist Media Studies, 17(6), 957–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2017.1338305 

    Guo, M., & Liu, Z. (2025). Hysteria in empathy: Understanding virtual companionship and emotional connection between humans and Al. Theory & Psychology, 35(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543251319738 

    Illouz, E. (1997). Consuming the romantic utopia: love and the cultural contradictions of capitalism. University of California Press. 

    Sequeira, R. (2022). The sciences of love: Intimate ‘democracy’ and the eugenic development of the Marathi couple in colonial India. History of the Human Sciences, 36(5), 68-93. https://doi.org/10.1177/09526951221134469 

    Sternberg, R. J., & Sternberg, K. (2024). A RELIC theory of love: The role of interpersonal, intrapersonal, and extrapersonal elements in love. Theory & Psychology, 34(5), 671-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543241270922 

    Thorne, S. R., Hegarty, P., & Hepper, E. G. (2019). Equality in theory: From a heteronormative to an inclusive psychology of romantic love. Theory & Psychology, 29(2), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319826725 

    Wolkomir, M. (2018). Researching romantic love and multiple partner intimacies: Developing a qualitative research design and tools. SAGE Publications Ltd.