{"id":110,"date":"2024-06-05T09:52:37","date_gmt":"2024-06-05T09:52:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/tass\/?page_id=110"},"modified":"2025-04-09T10:53:20","modified_gmt":"2025-04-09T10:53:20","slug":"why-the-tass","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/tass\/why-was-the-tass-developed\/","title":{"rendered":"Why was the TASS developed?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\n
\n
\n\tHome\n<\/span><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n

Why was the TASS developed?<\/h1>\n\n\n
\n
\n

The TASS is an updated version of the Talkabout Assessment (Kelly, 2010) and there are several reasons why the authors developed this new extended version. These relate to both the current research in social skills and the practical application and design of the Talkabout wheel. Specifically, it was necessary to consider:<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The hierarchy<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Talkabout is a programme that is hierarchical in it\u2019s approach \u2013 please see section on the hierarchy for more information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The original Talkabout Assessment assessed both nonverbal and verbal behaviours under the headings of body language, paralinguistic skills (or the way we talk), conversational skills and assertiveness skills. The assessment of self-awareness and self-esteem (the client interview) was developed separately and was recommended to be completed alongside the wheel at the point of initial assessment. This meant that the assessor completed two separate assessments which could make the links between them unclear for those using the assessment without having received training.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Anyone who has attended a Talkabout social skills training course will know how often the trainers impress the importance of working on self-awareness and self-esteem prior to social skills if needs are highlighted within this area. It seemed timely to develop an assessment which guides the assessor through each area of the updated hierarchy, to ensure information is captured together in one assessment, and that the assessor is guided very clearly to the key areas, and order for intervention.  <\/p>\n\n\n\n

The rating scale<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The original Talkabout Assessment used a 4-point rating scale from \u2018never good\u2019 to \u2018very good\u2019. The authors found over the years that this gives us less opportunity to show small amounts of progress over a shorter period. As a result, we devised additional target forms to help teachers and clinicians to rate individual skills on a 6-point rating scale from \u2018skill not present\u2019 to \u2018skill present and consistent\u2019. This enabled us to track progress within<\/em> intervention (ratings 1-4) and also to assess whether students have generalised skills outside<\/em> of the intervention (ratings 5-6). These target forms were then used to measure short term progress and the Talkabout Assessment Wheel was used to summarise the progress over the longer term. However, this all meant a doubling up of assessment data and so it has been recognised for a while that the ideal solution would be to update the Talkabout assessment and the rating scale used.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The TASS has therefore been updated to a 6-point rating scale, meaning that there is no longer a need to do separate short term and long-term assessments, as the TASS will be able to be used to measure both. This will help with measuring outcomes for intervention.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The wider context<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

The authors also want the assessment to have a holistic profile which draws on literature, specifically regarding current thinking about a definition of social skills and known correlates.  The Talkabout hierarchy has a focus on self-awareness and self-esteem and verbal and non-verbal aspects of social communication, as well as assertiveness skills.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Ongoing research in the USA has led to a definition of social and emotional skills called The CASEL 5 (CASEL, 2023) which includes: self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship skills, and responsible decision-making. It is also recognised that there are correlates to social skills, such as \u201ccompeting problem behaviours\u201d and \u201cacademic competence\u201d (Gresham & Elliott, 2008).  It was felt important to include these in an updated assessment to ensure a holistic assessment of the person\u2019s needs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Research demonstrates that social and emotional learning is linked to quality of life outcomes. Clarke et al (2021) summarised their findings by stating:  \u2018A growing body of evidence indicates that enhancing social, emotional and behavioural skills (including emotional identification, articulation and regulation; communication skills; conflict resolution skills; behavioural self-regulation; empathy and perspective taking) is a key determinant to young people\u2019s mental health and wellbeing, and supports them in achieving positive outcomes in school, work and life\u2019. In addition, the presence of internalising (e.g. depression, anxiety) or most notably externalising (e.g. aggression, impulsive behaviour) behaviours are associated with increased school absences, and have a detrimental effect on the acquisition and performance of social skills and academic achievements (Gresham, 2015).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

These known correlates were not measured in the original Talkabout assessment. Therefore, to ensure a holistic assessment takes place, the TASS includes a rating of associated and quality of life factors (see form 1) with the aim to capture any intervention effects with regards to these factors.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Social validity<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Social validity refers to the extent to which the individual and the key people surrounding that person view the intervention targets as important and acceptable, which is naturally an important consideration in any intervention. The literature also states the importance of measuring social validity pre and post intervention (Matson, Matson, & Rivet, 2007).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

To aid the assessor in considering whether intervention targets are socially valid, the TASS includes the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n