Home Students Chapter 2 – You are What You Eat: Culture, Norms, and Values

Chapter 2 – You are What You Eat: Culture, Norms, and Values

Chapter Summary

In every culture, people have to eat and drink to survive. Making food choices is particularly complex in contemporary consumer culture, where we are surrounded by food basics like rice, milk, and chicken, as well as branded food delights like “Flamin’ Hot Cool Ranch” Doritos, XXX Açai-Blueberry-Pomegranate Vitamin Water, and Frosted Red Velvet Pop Tarts. In this chapter, we will examine how the everyday practice of eating and drinking is profoundly social and sociological. Using food as a focal point allows us to understand different theoretical perspectives within sociology: Marxism and commodity fetishism, Durkheim’s perspective on food as totem, and feminist perspectives on foodwork in the home. By seeing food as more than a biological necessity, you will also come to see how food is a form of culture. We explore how our food choices and tastes relate to collective norms and values, how departures from collective norms and values result in deviance, and how such judgments illustrate contrasting concepts of ethnocentrism and cultural relativism.


Further Reading

Anderson, Benjamin. 2021. “The Forgotten Labour of Craft: Exploitation and Organizing in Artisanal Industries.” Labour / Le Travail 88. doi: 10.52975/llt.2021v88.0005

Do craft industries help workers escape exploitation and the illusion of products being disconnected from labor (commodity fetishism)? Recently, artisanal businesses like craft breweries and bakeries have been praised for being small, community-focused, and eco-friendly. However, Anderson (2021) argues that these industries might still conceal exploitative labor practices by emphasizing the “artisanal” quality of their products, which can distract from the harsh realities of production. At the same time, because of their small scale and focus on local consumption, craft industries have the potential to challenge this illusion.

Discussion questions
  • In what ways do craft industries (e.g., craft breweries) reproduce or challenge commodity fetishism?
  • How do these industries mirror or differ from Marx’s analysis of class relations under capitalist production?
  • What difficulties do both producers and consumers face in their efforts to transcend commodity fetishism, i.e., to lessen the gap between the product’s “mystical” appearance and its conditions of production?

Opie, Fredrick Douglass. 2008. Hogs and Hominy: Soul Food from Africa to America. Columbia University Press.

Frederick Douglass Opie’s Hogs and Hominy: Soul Food from Africa to America traces the origins and evolution of African American cuisine from Africa to the United States. The book examines how African culinary traditions were adapted through slavery, emancipation, and the Great Migration, creating the foundation of soul food. Opie emphasizes the role of food in forging a collective identity among African Americans, highlighting how shared culinary practices fostered community and cultural continuity. He shows how limited resources led to the development of a distinct and resilient culinary style. The work also explores the commercialization of soul food and its impact on American cuisine and culture. Overall, Opie illustrates how African American “soul food” serves as a powerful symbol of cultural heritage and identity.

Discussion questions
  • What role does food play in the formation and maintenance of collective identity among marginalized communities? How do these culinary practices change over time in response to different social, economic, political, and cultural pressures?
  • How have the culinary practices of African Americans served as a form of resistance and preservation of cultural identity in the face of social oppression?
  • How have socioeconomic factors shaped the development of African American cuisine, and what does this reveal about the intersection of race, class, and food access in the United States?
  • What does Durkheim’s concept of “totem” add to our understanding of a culture’s foodways? Where does it fall short?

Beagan, Brenda, Gwen. E. Chapman, Andrea D’Sylva, and B. Raewyn Bassett. 2008. “`It’s Just Easier for Me to Do It’: Rationalizing the Family Division of Foodwork.” Sociology 42(4):653–71. doi: 10.1177/0038038508091621.

Beagan et al.’s study explores how families rationalize the gendered division of food-related tasks. Despite women doing the majority of foodwork, this division is often viewed as fair by both men and women. The study highlights that gender roles are rarely explicitly stated; instead, rationales such as time availability, concern for family health, and the desire to reduce conflict are used. These justifications, although appearing gender-neutral, are deeply rooted in traditional gender expectations. The research includes perspectives from multiple family members across different ethno-cultural groups in Canada, revealing nuanced differences in how foodwork is perceived and justified.

Discussion questions
  • How are patriarchal divisions of household labour maintained in foodwork, even in the context of egalitarian gender ideals? How does the notion of ‘choice’ in justifying foodwork responsibilities obscure underlying gender inequalities?
  • In what ways do different ethno-cultural backgrounds influence the perceived fairness and rationale behind the division of foodwork within families?
  • To what extent does the desire to reduce family conflict impact women’s willingness to engage in the majority of foodwork, and how does this reflect broader societal expectations of women’s roles in the family?
  • What kinds of social changes might be necessary to achieve a more equitable division of social reproductive labour?

Quizzes

Test your knowledge with the Chapter 2 quizzes!


Active Learning – Further Online Resources

The true cost of a burger:

Economists writing for the American Institute for Economic Research write about the effects of government agricultural subsidies on the food system, and they illustrate these effects through the case of the hamburger. The “true” cost of a hamburger is potentially far great than what consumers actually pay. Consider the theoretical perspectives discussed in this chapter; which perspective do you think these economists are coming from? Do you think the price we pay for a burger should more accurately reflect these hidden costs? https://www.aier.org/article/the-true-cost-of-a-hamburger/

Inside the refrigerator:

Apply your sociological understanding to an everyday household object: your fridge. Photographer Mark Menjivar’s project, capturing intimate glimpses into refrigerators across the United States, offers a fascinating sociological window into our lives. Read his interview with Lynne Rossetto Kasper and see if you can identify connections to at least TWO key terms introduced in this chapter. http://www.splendidtable.org/story/photographer-takes-voyeuristic-peek-inside-refrigerators Which refrigerator resonates most with you and why? Take a photograph of your own fridge and compare it with a classmate or friend. What can you glean about someone’s culture, values, and identity simply from looking inside their refrigerator? How might the contents of a refrigerator reflect social class, dietary habits, or even family dynamics? Do you see evidence of any of the sociological concepts we’ve discussed, like norms, values, or material culture, manifested in these fridges?

The joy of food:

The National Geographic presents a photo gallery of historical and contemporary collective food experiences. Take a look at these pictures.  https://www.nationalgeographic.com/foodfeatures/joy-of-food/  After reviewing the pictures, answer these questions. Food as a Uniting Force: In what ways does food bring people together? How does food create a sense of community, belonging, and shared identity? Can you recall specific dishes or traditions that hold special meaning for you and your loved ones? Can you share a story where food played a pivotal role in bringing people together, fostering connection, or sparking joy? Food as Boundary Work: Food can also draw boundaries and distinctions. Consider dietary restrictions, cultural taboos, or even the simple act of choosing a restaurant. How do food choices reflect social class, cultural identity, or personal values? Have you ever felt excluded or judged based on your food preferences? Have you experienced situations where food created divisions or highlighted differences?


Flashcards

Refresh your knowledge of key terms with this chapter’s flashcards.

Culture

Systems and patterns of symbols, meaning, and values that are shared by members of a group; includes both material and non-material aspects

Inequality

Uneven distribution of resources, opportunities, and privileges among individuals or groups within a society

Food insecurity

Lack of consistent access to affordable, healthy, and culturally appropriate food

Theoretical perspectives

Models for studying society or a specific element of social life; each makes particular assumptions and focuses on particular analytic problems (e.g., functionalism, Marxism, symbolic interactionism)

Marxist perspectives

Approaches to sociological thinking that draw from the work of Karl Marx; often focus on class conflict in capitalist societies

Commodity fetishism

A Marxist term describing how various facets of production are obscured at the final end-point of consumption

Durkheimian perspectives

Approaches to sociological thinking that draw from the work of Emile Durkheim; focus on the maintenance of social solidarity and cohesion between different parts of society

Totem

An object, animal, force, or phenomenon used as an emblem to represent aspects of a group’s shared identity. Totems are collectively revered serve to foster group solidarity

Feminist perspectives

Approaches to sociological thinking that seek to understand and critique gender inequality

Femininity

The traits, practices, meanings, and value associated with being a woman in a given context; ideas of femininity are socially constructed and vary across and within different times, spaces, and cultures

Qualitative interviewing

A sociological research method in which the researcher asks a series of open-ended questions in order to elicit narratives from a participant; often used to understand individuals’ experiences, interpretations, and identities

Norms

Often informal, but widely known and accepted ways of doing things within a particular culture

Deviance

A violation of social norms, as defined by a particular culture

Sanction

An action that indicates the approval or disapproval of conduct relating to a social norm; may be positive (i.e., reward) or negative (i.e., penalty); informal or formal

Values

Beliefs held by individuals or groups about what is right and wrong, important and unimportant, desirable and undesirable, and about how we should live

Cultural relativism

The idea that we should try to understand an individual’s beliefs, behavior, feelings, and worldview in relation to his or her culture

Ethnocentrism

Using your own cultural values and standards to understand and evaluate other cultures; often involves the beliefs that one’s own culture is superior to others

Social control

The process of regulating individuals’ behavior to ensure that it conforms to group expectations

Normative approach

A normative approach to research does not just concern itself with finding the " facts" , but also injects a perspective about what is right and wrong; this approach is not only concerned with the ways things are, but also how they ought to be

Ethnographic research

A sociological research method in which the researcher observes and/or interacts with people in everyday contexts in order to describe and interpret actions, settings, experiences, or ways of life from an insider’s perspective

Subculture

A smaller cultural group with its own norms, values, symbols, and styles that distinguish it from the larger culture

Empirical approach

Research that aims to document the social world through observation, experience, or experiment, without normatively evaluating these realities; this research focuses on what is, not what ought to be