Chapter 13 – Cars
Chapter Summary
Cars are an ideal example for understanding how our stuff has profound cultural and material dimensions. Cars are not only a means of transportation but a powerful marker of identity. How you get around—whether by car or truck, bike or bus—depends on your financial means, but it can also say something about the image you want to project. Certain cars are strongly associated with masculinity, and can also be a way to signal racial or ethnic identities. Cars are symbolically dense cultural commodities, but they are also material goods that can help us understand shifting economic structures, especially the transition from a Fordist economy of industrial manufacturing to a post-Fordist economy. Car culture also offers a clear example of how social structures work to shape our decisions by providing specific opportunities and constraints regarding our transportation. Outlining these social structures promotes a systemic understanding of social outcomes, an understanding that greatly improves on explanations that focus on individuals’ decisions. North Americans’ love affair with the car is longstanding but has its share of challengers. Choosing different modes of transportation (e.g. bikes, public transit, hybrid cars) has become an important way to signal environmental concern about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, and may also offer an exit strategy from the stresses of mainstream car culture (e.g. car payments, traffic, road rage). As such, thinking sociologically about cars demonstrates how people do not uncritically accept consumer culture; the car industry is powerful, but it does not erase human agency. Car culture inspires desire amongst consumers for the latest products, but knowledge of the material implications of car culture works to animate environmentalism and social movement engagement.
Further Reading
Alam, Yunis. 2020. Race, Taste, Class and Cars: Culture, Meaning and Identity.
Policy Press. Chapter 4, “Consuming Cars: Class, Ethnicity, and Taste.”
This chapter examines how car consumption reflects patterns of class and ethnic stratification, focusing on a Pakistani-heritage community in the United Kingdom. It highlights how car ownership in this community evolved from a functional necessity to a marker of status and integration, shaped by economic mobility and cultural integration. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concept of habitus, the chapter embeds participants’ tastes for cars in their social positions as working-class, second-generation immigrants. The author also critiques public and mass media narratives that marginalize working-class and ethnic car cultures, showing how taste functions as both a reflection of and a tool for negotiating class and ethnic boundaries.
Discussion questions
- How do social forces like class and ethnicity shape the meanings and aspirations associated with car ownership?
- How do car cultures enable both cultural integration and stigmatization for marginalized groups?
- How do notions of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ taste relate to broader social inequalities?
- In what ways do media portrayals of car culture marginalize working-class and minority ethnic communities, and how do these portrayals reinforce social divisions? How does the author’s approach differ from these representations?
Kennedy, Emily H., and Carly Hamdon. 2023. “Do People Who Drive Trucks Care About the Environment?” Contexts, 22(3): 18-23.
This article explores the social and moral judgments embedded in discourses around consumption and the environment. Based on interview data, the authors outline a “hierarchy of environmentalism,” or a set of cultural classifications that link social status to eco-friendly consumption practices. Class distinctions play a crucial role in shaping this hierarchy, as practices like driving electric cars or buying organic food often require significant investments of cultural and economic capital. While eco-friendly practices are seen as markers of moral superiority, those who cannot (or do not) adopt these consumer practices are perceived as less responsible or caring. They argue that this hierarchy fosters social and political polarization, impeding collective efforts to address pressing environmental issues including climate change.
Discussion questions
- What is the hierarchy of environmentalism? How do ideas about ethical consumption influence how we think about environmental issues and responsibilities?
- How do class relations, including inequalities of cultural and economic capital, shape the hierarchical classification of environmental attitudes and practices?
- How does this classification system contribute to political polarization around environmental issues like climate change?
- How can recognizing and respecting alternative relationships to the environment, such as those of “resistant” or “anti-environmentalists,” contribute to more effective environmental action?
Schor, Juliet B., Willaim Attwood-Charles, Mehmet Cansoy, et al. 2020. “Dependence and Precarity in the Platform Economy.” Theory and Society, 49(1): 833-861.
The rapid expansion of platform-based labor, as exemplified by companies like Uber and Airbnb, has raised critical questions about job precarity and algorithmic control. Through in-depth interviews, the authors find that workers’ dependency on platform income plays a key role in shaping their experiences: those relying on platforms to meet basic expenses face greater precarity and dissatisfaction, while those using platform earnings as supplemental income report higher satisfaction, greater autonomy, and better earnings. This contrast stems from supplemental earners’ ability to reject low-paying or undesirable tasks, whereas dependent workers often feel compelled to accept any opportunity to secure income. The authors argue that the sharing economy is not a monolith but comprises a diverse workforce with varying levels of agency and dependence.
Discussion questions
- How does the rise of the sharing economy reflect the broader transition from Fordist models of stable employment to post-Fordist economies characterized by flexibility, decentralization, and precarious work arrangements?
- How do platforms use algorithmic control to manage workers, and how does this differ from traditional forms of labor management?
- How do workers’ level of economic dependence on platform income shape their experiences and work satisfaction? What implications does this have for understanding labor precarity in the sharing economy?
- What do the authors mean when they argue that platforms “free-ride” on conventional labor markets? What does this mean for the relationship between platforms and socio-economic inequalities?
Quizzes
Test your knowledge with the Chapter 13 quizzes!
Quiz
Active Learning – Further Online Resources
A decline in car culture?
How can we understand the decrease in the rates of car ownership among young people? Rates of both driving and ownership are down among younger age groups. Is this decline primarily economically based, or is it more cultural and related to different values and lifestyle priorities? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-03-01/is-gen-z-really-done-with-driving-cars-don-t-bet-on-it
Unequal transportation options:
Many people cannot afford to own a car. For some, public transportation is the only way to get to work or to school. Although there is a lot of diversity across cities, economically disadvantaged neighborhoods tend to have access to worse public transportation options. What are the social implications of this discrepancy? How can inequality in transportation access feed into broader inequalities?
https://www.transportation.gov/priorities/equity/justice40/transportation-insecurity-analysis-tool
A world without cars:
Watch this video essay from the YouTube channel Our Changing Climate that critiques car-centric transportation systems: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpo1iiuSumM . According to the video, why do we need a world without cars? How have car-centric transportation systems historically reinforced racial and economic disparities? What are the environmental consequences of car dependency? Based on the solutions presented in the video (e.g., free public transit, reduced car usage, expanded bike lanes), do you think these ideas are feasible in your community or city? What obstacles might exist, and how could they be addressed?
60-mile traffic jam!
Read this news story, which describes an extreme version of an event that almost everyone has experienced—a traffic jam. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/aug/24/china-60-mile-motorway-tailback.Thinking about this traffic jam, observe the state of traffic where you live. Does traffic flow well, or is it relatively clogged? Keep a log of the time you spend in transit for one week. How does that time break down by different modes of transit? Are your choices about how to travel relatively open, or are you strongly constrained to public transportation, car travel, or a non-motorized option?
Flashcards
Refresh your knowledge of key terms with this chapter’s flashcards.
