Chapter 4 – Coffee
Chapter Summary
This chapter explores how our consumer tastes connect to our social class. We discuss how visible and demonstrative consumption habits—conspicuous consumption—distinguish some groups from others. We also identify the differences between Bourdieu’s concepts of economic, cultural, and social capital. The case of coffee, and coffee shops more specifically, is used to examine the sociological concepts of public space and third place. Finally, we explain coffee’s connection to globalized commodity chains and describe how a $5 cappuccino is connected to poverty and hardship for coffee growers and laborers.
Further Reading
Fischer, Edward F. 2021. “Quality and inequality: creating value worlds with Third Wave coffee.” Socio-Economic Review 19(1):111-131.
The article focuses on the burgeoning high-end (‘Third Wave’) coffee market in the USA and examines how economic gains are extracted by translating values across symbolic and material worlds. It explores how roasters, baristas, and marketers have developed a new lexicon of quality for coffee, tied to narratives of provenance and exclusivity, which creates much of the value added in the Third Wave market. The article also highlights how this disadvantages smallholding coffee farmers, particularly Maya farmers in Guatemala, who lack the social and cultural capital needed to extract surplus symbolic value from their crops, perpetuating classic dependency patterns of global capital accumulation.
Discussion questions
- How does the Third Wave coffee market demonstrate the role of cultural capital in consumption?
- Describe the relationship between coffee producers and consumers in the Third Wave coffee market. How does it differ from pre-existing coffee commodity chains in terms of the outcomes for producers?
- What does the concept of “symbolic value worlds” mean and how does it illustrate key concepts from Chapter 4?
- What does this article add to our understanding of the ways that global commodity chains function beyond what was discussed in Chapter 4?
Bookman, Sonia. 2013. “Coffee Brands, Class and Culture in a Canadian City.” European Journal of Cultural Studies 16(4):405–423.
Bookman’s article explores how coffee brands in Canada, particularly Tim Hortons, Starbucks, and Second Cup, shape and reflect social class distinctions. Using qualitative data from interviews, she examines how these brands offer consumers distinct experiences that reinforce notions of class, such as cosmopolitanism versus Canadianness and connoisseurship versus “ordinary” consumption. Consumers use these brands not only as markers of class identity but also as tools to actively perform class distinctions. The study demonstrates that everyday consumer choices play a central role in shaping and expressing social class boundaries.
Discussion questions
- When you want coffee, where do you typically go and why (e.g., convenience, atmosphere, price, or brand)?
- How do coffee brands like Tim Hortons and Starbucks offer distinct experiences that reinforce social class identities and boundaries?
- In what ways do consumers use coffee brands to create or perform class distinctions? How does cultural capital influence coffee choices? Can you think of examples from your own experience?
- Think of your favourite coffee shop. Does this coffee shop serve as a third place, where you can relax or socialize outside of home or work? In your opinion, are some coffee brands (like Starbucks or Tim Hortons) better at creating this ‘third place’ environment? Why?
Trigg, Andrew B. 2001. “Veblen, Bourdieu, and Conspicuous Consumption.” Journal of Economic Issues 35(1):99–115. doi: 10.1080/00213624.2001.11506342.
This article offers an accessible comparison of Thorstein Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption and Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of cultural capital. Veblen’s theory focuses on how individuals emulate the consumption patterns of higher social classes to signal their status. Critics argue that this view is limited, emphasizing a one-way “trickle-down” effect. In contrast, Bourdieu shows how consumption patterns flow both up and down the social ladder, allowing for a more flexible analysis of consumption and social hierarchy.
Discussion questions
- How do the perspectives of Veblen and Bourdieu differ in explaining the role of social class in shaping consumption patterns and tastes?
- What are some limitations of “trickle-down” consumption? Can you think of examples in which consumer tastes trickle “up” or “round,” in Trigg’s terms?
- Where do the working- and middle-classes figure in both Veblen and Bourdieu’s analysis? What role do these classes play in shaping, transforming, or resisting dominant tastes?
- Can we apply Veblen’s and Bourdieu’s ideas to understanding consumption in today’s digital, influencer-driven economy, where social media amplifies the visibility of consumption choices?
Quizzes
Test your knowledge with the Chapter 4 quizzes!
Quiz
Active Learning – Further Online Resources
$7 coffee?
Watch this Jimmy Kimmel clip about the introduction of a $7 cup of coffee at Starbucks. How do the people drinking the coffee display their social status as they experience the coffee? Did the ending of the video surprise you? If so, why? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxlGI4OzeBk
Fair trade, ethical consumption, and corporate public relations:
Look at the website, http://fairworldproject.org/ which seeks to protect the fair-trade label from being diluted, misrepresented, and misused. Now look at the website of a major corporate coffee or chocolate producer (e.g. Hershey’s or Starbucks). Can you identify what strategies they use to promote themselves as a socially responsible corporation? What claims seem substantiated, and what claims seem more ornamental?
The significance of your coffee order?
Watch this clip from the Tom Hanks movie, “You’ve Got Mail”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZ7lFV9Z2hk. In it, Tom Hanks’s character delivers the following pronouncement: “The whole purpose of places like Starbucks is for people with no decision-making ability whatsoever to make six decisions just to buy one cup of coffee. Short. Tall. Light. Dark. Caf. Decaf. Low-fat. Non-fat. Etc. So for people who don’t know what the hell they’re doing, or who on earth they are, can, for $2.95, get not just a cup of coffee, but an absolute defining sense of self.” Do you agree? Disagree? Does something as seemingly mundane as a coffee order provide people with a defining sense of self? How has the link between coffee and identity changed since this movie came out in 1998?
Blood, Sweat, and Luxuries:
Watch this documentary from YouTube channel Only Human, in which three British consumers embark on a journey to work on the coffee plantations of Yirgacheffe, Ethiopia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSjD8QFSl7Y. How does seeing the living and working conditions on Ethiopian coffee plantations affect your view of coffee as a consumer? What global inequalities are hidden behind our everyday coffee consumption?
Flashcards
Refresh your knowledge of key terms with this chapter’s flashcards.
