Home / Student Resources / Chapter 4 – Evaluating Abstracts

Chapter 4 – Evaluating Abstracts

Whether looking for research articles in library databases or using a specialized search engine like Google Scholar, one is likely to find dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of articles on any topic of interest. To help consumers of research decide if the article provides information about what they are looking for, article titles should be concise, specific, free of jargon or acronyms, while also mentioning such key attributes of the study as variables, participants, underlying theory, or any other special features that make the study stand out among other studies on the same topic. Moreover, caution should be exercised when the title implies causality or starts with a clever or catchy phrase not carrying important information about the study. These are the evaluation questions that this chapter applies to article titles, along with explanations and examples. The end-of-chapter exercises also provide a nice variety of actual article titles from studies recently published in academic journals in order to practice the evaluation criteria discussed in the chapter.

Multiple Choice Questions

Online Resources:

APA 7th edition Abstract and Keyword Guide:
https://apastyle.apa.org/instructional-aids/abstract-keywords-guide.pdf

Do journal articles with amusing titles garner more interest from other researchers?

Are claims of causality in articles make it more likely that the article gets featured in the news headlines?
https://bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12916-019-1324-7

Correlation and causality:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/probability/xa88397b6:scatterplots/estimating-trend-lines/v/correlation-and-causality

Graphical abstracts:

An example of a video abstract (in journal Pediatrics):

Research on the effectiveness of visual abstracts and plain language summaries:

  Back To TopTo top