{"id":50,"date":"2024-03-05T10:47:28","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T10:47:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/?page_id=50"},"modified":"2024-10-07T13:03:42","modified_gmt":"2024-10-07T13:03:42","slug":"mooting","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/legal-skills-guide\/mooting\/","title":{"rendered":"Mooting Skills"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Mooting is an excellent way of learning, practising and perfecting advocacy. By participating in mooting, you will learn to do what lawyers do on a daily basis. Plus, you will increase your confidence and enhance your CV.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This resource helps you develop your own mooting skills. If you work through all the modules in this resource, you should be able to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n A moot is a fictitious legal debate simulating the argument of counsel on points of law, set in an appellate jurisdiction. Two student counsel (a senior and a junior) on each side argue points of law arising from the fictitious appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The moot bench comprises one or more judges, played by academics, practising lawyers or real judges. The bench rules on points of law, and your mooting ability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> A moot is not a mock trial, which is a fictitious representation of a first instance trial involving witnesses, a jury and the establishment of the credibility of evidence. Mooting allows you to focus on the law rather than be swamped by the complexities of organising a mock trial.<\/p>\n\n\n\n By participating in mooting, you will learn to do what lawyers do on a daily basis. Mooting increases your confidence, enhances your CV and develops your skills of:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Last but not least, mooting is fun.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In many ways, academic legal studies focus on areas where the law is still developing or is unsettled. In real life, cases rarely touch on these cutting edge issues and instead concentrate on one or two key points. Mooting trains you to find those key points quickly and efficiently. As most moots are time-constrained, you will also learn the art of distinguishing the relevant from the periphery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The quality of a mooters argument(s) will depend, to a considerable extent, on the amount of careful thought they have given to the moot problem and on the depth of their research. Mooters learn to navigate their way through primary and secondary sources.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Find out more about thinking and research<\/a> when preparing for a moot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In order to put together persuasive arguments within the permitted time limits, mooters must analyse large quantities of information and decant them into a cohesive set of points.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As virtually all moots involve students working together as teams, mooting inculcates the skill of working with others to achieve the best possible collective result. In all mooting competitions, the students that score the highest mark as a team will win the moot.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Mooting is an excellent way of learning, practising and perfecting advocacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Advocacy is a skill required of many who work in the legal sphere. Barristers must obviously be good advocates, but increasingly solicitors also have rights of audience in the courts and a number, called Solicitor Advocates, now specialise in advocacy work. Outside of the specialist legal professions, graduates with advocacy ability will be able to call on those skills when preparing for and making presentations to an audience.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cWe learn advocacy by doing. So, practise. Practise. Practise. Practise\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Ian Morley, an Oxford graduate and world debating champion, now a barrister specialising in Criminal Law, from chambers at 23 Essex Street, London.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Knowledge of the law is one thing, being able to present it coherently and persuasively is altogether more daunting. Mooting helps build confidence in your ability as an advocate. If you have successfully presented cases in front of experienced legal practitioners and tutors, you will gain the confidence to present cases in real tribunals later on in life.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Advocacy is a specialism, and competition for places is fierce. Some Bar Courses will only admit students with a proven track record in mooting.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The taste of advocacy presented by mooting will help you decide if life as an advocate is indeed for you, or if you would enjoy other aspects of the law more.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scroll down to read about the main preparatory tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Popular drama usually depicts advocacy as no more than a glamorous lawyer making a few \u2018case-winning\u2019 points in a packed courtroom, usually arrived at in a moment of sheer inspiration! A true advocate, however, will tell you that the many hours spent researching and preparing for a case are the true lynchpins to success.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Thinking<\/a> and research<\/a> are interdependent: thinking about the problem will suggest lines of enquiry; what your research reveals will provoke further thought. Both processes call for hard work. A good quality argument, supported by the best possible authorities, is the reward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n When thinking about your argument, start by considering the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n All of these can be discerned from the moot problem itself.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You should then list all the issues which arise, and the likely arguments for both sides. You must select the best points to use and decide on the best order in which to present them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> The moot problem will often list these issues for you, in the form of the points of appeal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Start by reading all the relevant statutory and case authorities, plus any other relevant articles.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The object of your research is very much to get your head around the legal issues which are raised by the moot question. You should then formulate the arguments which you will use in your oral submissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Points you will want to make during submissions will be both positive and negative in nature. Positive points are those which advance your own arguments. Negative points are put forward to rebut the submissions of your opponent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you have more points than you can hope to cover in the time available, be prepared to jettison the least important. Remember that the strength of your argument is not improved by adding weak points to strong ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A moot is an exercise in intellectual persuasion. The argument must be conducted in a coherent fashion, step by step. As a rule of thumb, it is advisable for you to put forward your positive points before your negative ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The best logical order for your points may become apparent only when your preparation is well advanced. The important thing is to be satisfied, before you complete your preparation, that your argument is as clear and compelling as you can make it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once you have your points organised, you need to compose your Heads of Argument, sometimes also called Skeleton Arguments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Heads of Argument are a summary of the principal points of submission you intend to make, plus the authorities you are intending to rely on during the moot itself. View a sample set of Heads of <\/a>Argument<\/a> here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Normally, Heads of Argument must be exchanged with opposing mooters and sent to the judge a few days in advance of the moot. Most mooting competitions<\/a> have set rules about when Heads of Arguments must be exchanged. The principle behind exchange of Heads is that everyone involved in the moot know what will be argued on the day \u2014 the mooters can prepare their rebuttals, and judges have the opportunity to examine the points which the mooting teams are proposing to raise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Once you have received your opponents’ Heads of Argument, you should align your negative points to ensure they rebut your opponents’ arguments effectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> You no longer have the ability to alter your own Skeleton Arguments at this stage, but you may still modify the focus of your submissions as a result of the exchange of the Heads of Argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Prepare notes of key points for your submissions, not a full speech.<\/p>\n\n\n\n A moot is not<\/u><\/em> an exercise in speech-reading. Instead, it is all about persuading the court to accept your submissions. You will repeatedly be told that the art of advocacy is not that of reading a speech. It may be comforting when you are at the beginning of your mooting career to start by writing a speech, but an audience is rarely persuaded by someone who is merely reading off a sheet of paper! If your preparations are good, you should be able to make your submissions from notes, including any key phrases that will comfort you to have available to quote.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tips:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n Where your notes refer to a decision, include clear indications of the location of any passages that you may need to refer to, e.g., those you think the judge may ask you about. A useful way of holding this kind of information without cluttering the main note is to use a double page spread, reserving one side for the course of the argument and the names of cases, etc, and the other side for subsidiary material such as page references. Or find some other method that suits you.<\/p>\n\n\n\n At the beginning of your notes, it is usually good practice to have a statement of the bare bones of your argument. Do this in the form of some simple propositions that you can state at the outset (and dictate if the judge wants to write them down). These submissions should appear in your Heads of Argument<\/a> and the judge can be directed to them in that document.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Your argument will be directed to establishing your submissions either cumulatively or in the alternative. For example, your submission might be:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> Run it by a friend or tutor to see if they agree with your line of argument.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scroll down to read about the main delivery tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You are in theory appearing in court; therefore you should dress<\/a> and behave<\/a> in a manner that reflects the order and solemnity of such a forum.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Some mooting competitions specify a dress code, otherwise wear formal attire:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Stand up when a judge enters court and when they rise to leave court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n During the moot, only one counsel should be standing at a time (unless the judge indicates that they want to address two counsels together). If the judge addresses you when you are seated, stand. If the judge addresses another counsel while you are on your feet, sit down until the judge is ready for you to resume.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tips:<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n The first thing you should note is the court you are appearing in as the courts in the UK adopt a range of different titles for judges depending on the position of the court within the hierarchy. See Chapters 4 and 5 of Slapper & Kelly’s English Legal System for more on the structure and hierarchy of the courts. However, as most moots are set within the Supreme Court or Court of Appeal, the mooter’s job here is simpler than that of a real-life counsel!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Say \u2018My Lord\u2019 or \u2018My Lady\u2019 (not \u2018Sir\u2019 nor \u2018Your Lordship\u2019 or \u2018Your Ladyship\u2019). For example, \u2018My Lord, my next submission is\u2026\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Use \u2018Your Lordship\u2019 or \u2018Your Ladyship\u2019 in place of \u2018you\u2019. For example, \u2018As Your Ladyship is no doubt aware\u2026\u2019 or \u2018Would Your Lordship please refer to paragraph two\u2026?\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Call them \u2018Their Lordships\u2019, \u2018Her Ladyship\u2019, \u2018The Learned Judge\u2019, \u2018Lord Justices\u2019, \u2018The Master of the Rolls\u2019, \u2018Mr Justice Laddie\u2019, \u2018Lord Justice Bingham\u2019, \u2018the Lord Chief Justice\u2019, and so on.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> You may drop either the title or the name for brevity on subsequent repetition but be careful to remain respectful at all times.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Opposing counsel are \u2018my learned friends\u2019. Your own counsel colleague is \u2018my learned friend\u2019 or \u2018my learned leader or junior\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Leading counsel for the appellant should rise when the judge indicates readiness, and:<\/p>\n\n\n\n The usual formula is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMay it please Your Lordship, I (adding your own name, if you are not yet known to the court) appear in this case with my learned friend Mr Willie Waffle for the appellant, and my learned friends Ms Manvir Mumble and Mr Shouter Smith and appear for the respondent.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n You should then state succinctly the nature of the appeal:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cMy Lord, this an appeal against a conviction of murder on the ground that the trial judge, Mr Justice Obama, misdirected the jury in relation to the defence of diminished responsibility.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n You should then outline the facts of the case, i.e., the decision being appealed from and the grounds of appeal. You may usefully pause from time to time during this introduction, to emphasise matters which you think significant for the case. For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cYour Lordship will observe that when the appellant posted his letter of acceptance, the respondent had taken no steps to revoke his offer and, so far as the appellant knew, the offer was still open to acceptance.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n You should inform the court which points you will deal with, and which will be left to your junior.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Counsel advances arguments not opinions. When arguing points of law, always say, \u2018I submit that\u2026\u2019 or \u2018I suggest that\u2026\u2019 rather than \u2018In my opinion\u2026\u2019 or \u2018I think that\u2026\u2019.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You should expect to be interrupted by the judge with questions, suggestions and sometimes rulings. Your ability to deal with interruptions from the bench is considered in assessing your performance.<\/p>\n\n\n\n This is another reason not to write a speech as a fully scripted presentation will not give you the flexibility to deal with such interventions without interrupting your flow, or you may find that in answering the question you end up repeating the same point when you come to it later within your speech. If your preparation is good, and your notes are well organised, you should be able to adapt your presentation to handle any such judicial interventions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Listen to the question and think before you start answering the question. Quite often, especially when mooters are nervous, they blurt out the first words that come to their head when being asked a question, only to find that they cannot usefully complete a sentence using those first words without contradicting their submissions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Treat the judge’s questions and suggestions with proper respect and appreciation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI am grateful to Your Ladyship for that suggestion, which I should like to adopt\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Do not hesitate to respond firmly when necessary, but always remember that you must respect the authority of the judge. For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe case Your Lordship mentions may at first sight seem to be against me, but I submit that it is readily distinguishable\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If you are obliged to submit to a ruling of the court on some point, the customary formula is \u2018I am obliged\u2019 (spoken with dignity and without resentment).<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> Watch Lawbore’s video tutorial on handling questioning<\/a> here.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scroll down to read about the different authorities.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You must refer to statutory provisions accurately. Sections are divided into sub-sections and further sub-divided into paragraphs and sub-paragraphs. Schedules (pronounced \u2018shedules\u2019) are divided into paragraphs and sub-paragraphs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The formal method of citing cases is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c\u2026in the case of Smith and Jones, which is reported in the first volume of the King\u2019s Bench Reports for 2023 at page 666\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n In criminal cases in which the Crown is a party (R. v\u2026) the correct formula is:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Crown against Clinton.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n But many judges do not object to a briefer, more informal style, especially if the case has already been previously mentioned:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c2023 one King\u2019s Bench Reports page 666\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n or:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cin the case of Clinton.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> You should not abbreviate King\u2019s Bench to KB.<\/p>\n\n\n\n If the judge has a copy of the report, direct him or her clearly to any passage you wish to quote:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cthe judgment of Lord Woolf at page 115, by the letter F, where His Lordship held\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> Watch the movement of the judge \u2014 allow him or her time to find the passage before you begin reading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You will not have time to recite the facts of every case. But if the facts are crucial to the significance of the case, you must do so; and you must always be prepared to do so if the court requires it. If in doubt, ask. For example:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cI cite this case simply for the principle of law stated by the court, but if your lordship wishes to be reminded of the facts\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> Check out our using cases skills guide to find out more about reading, understanding and citing cases.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Permission may be obtained to borrow case law reports from the Library for mooting purposes. Bring the appropriate volumes with you and arrange them in front of you in chronological order or in the order in which you intend to use them; and mark the passages you will refer to with slips of paper.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Read from the reports, not from your notes or from the casebooks. If possible, it would be advisable to have the Clerk hand a volume to the judge, open at the appropriate page, before you begin referring to the passage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You are there to assist the court and it is your duty to refer the court to a statutory provision or a decision which is against your case even if your opponent appears not to know of it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n As writers of textbooks and articles are not, strictly speaking, authorities (unless they are dead and were rather eminent when alive, e.g., Professor J.C. Smith), the correct way to refer to a living author is to adopt his or her views as part of your argument. It is noted that nowadays courts are usually willing to be referred directly to views expressed in textbooks and periodical literature.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Remember to close your argument. Compared to a real courtroom, a moot is time-constrained, but you should still round off your submissions with a few short sentences which explain exactly what conclusion your team is asking the judge to arrive at.<\/p>\n\n\n\n You might begin your conclusion with something akin to:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIn conclusion My Lords\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n and round it up with:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cFor these reasons I ask that this appeal be allowed, the conviction of murder quashed, and a conviction of manslaughter substituted.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n or:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201c\u2026that this appeal be dismissed, and the respondent awarded the costs of the appeal.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n Many universities run mooting competitions which are open to their students, and some make participation compulsory for all students! At some institutions, students who are interested form mooting societies. There are also inter-university mooting competitions. Many of these are sponsored by large law chambers\/firms and carry prestigious and lucrative prizes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Universities are always looking out for students to play an active role in the mooting process, as organisers as well as mooters. Try it \u2014 it can be fun and will also earn you lots of goodwill with your institution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scroll down to read about the different stages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n For a mooting competition to run smoothly, it is vital that you get your organisation right. Organising a moot competition takes a lot of time and effort, but if properly done can be extremely rewarding. Do not attempt to organise a moot competition unless you are prepared to put in the hard work, as a badly run competition will erode goodwill and your energy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Most moot competitions adopt a knockout structure very similar to that adopted by many sports events, such as the FA Cup, or Wimbledon Tennis Championships. All teams are placed into a pyramidal draw, where the winners progress to the next round and the losers exit the competition. Winning teams are then paired up to play the next round, and this carries on until there is only one winning team left. They become the champions. This structure is fairly straightforward and readily understood due to its common usage. The main disadvantage of the knockout structure is that teams have to get it right at the outset as they do not get a second chance \u2014 a poor performance in the first-round spells the end of the competition for them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Hence, some mooting competitions have now adopted what could be termed the \u2018Football World Cup\u2019 structure, where teams are placed into groups in the preliminary stage. At this stage the teams moot against every other team in their group, and score points for wins. The teams with the highest points at the end of the preliminary rounds then progress to the quarterfinals, semifinals and final. Although this structure gives all teams the opportunity to moot more than once, be aware that it is also a lot more time and resource intensive \u2014 teams have to prepare for multiple moots within a short space of time, judges and rooms have to be found to accommodate the many moots and some students will drop out when they realise that preparing for a number of moots is hard work!<\/p>\n\n\n\n Having decided on the structure you then have to devise a set of rules and procedures for the competition. Download an example<\/a> of a \u2018Football World Cup\u2019 structure competition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Here are some sample moot questions to help you get started:<\/p>\n\n\n\n R v James<\/em> Download full question<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Smith and Rose v Tiger Motors plc<\/em> Download full question<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n R v Devagne<\/em> Download full question<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Top tip:<\/em> You can find more sample moot questions online or use questions from past years of the ESU\/Essex Court Chambers National Mooting Competition<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n David Pope and Daniel Hill’s podcast on effective mooting and advocacy ESU\/Essex Court Chambers National Mooting Competition European Law Court Moot Competition European Law Moot Court Competition video Lawbore’s Introduction to Mooting PDF Lawbore’s Mooting video tutorial London Universities Mooting Shield Competition Mooting Net OUP and BPP National Mooting Competition Mooting is an excellent way of learning, practising and perfecting advocacy. By participating in mooting, you will learn to do what lawyers do on a daily basis. Plus, you will increase your confidence and enhance your CV. About Mooting What is Mooting? A moot is a fictitious legal debate simulating the argument of counsel on points […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":40,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-50","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":397,"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/50\/revisions\/397"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/40"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/routledgelearning.com\/englishlegalsystem\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}About this resource<\/summary>\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n\n\n\nAbout Mooting<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
What is Mooting?<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Why <\/strong>bother?<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Legal thinking and research<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Analysis<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Teamwork<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Advocacy<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Preparing for a Moot<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Thinking and research<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Thinking<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Research<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Organising your points<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Choosing points<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Ordering points<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Heads of Argument [HoA]<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Submitting HoA<\/em><\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Opposing HoA<\/em><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Preparing your notes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
References<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Establishing your principal submissions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Delivering a Moot<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Dressing and behaving appropriately<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Dress<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Behaviour<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Addressing the judge and counsel<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Directly addressing the judge<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Referring to the judge<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Other judges<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Counsel<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Introduction by the first mooter<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\n
Introduce counsel and the case<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The nature of the appeal<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
The facts of the case<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Submissions not opinions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Handling questions, suggestions and rulings<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
<\/a>Preparing for questions<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Think first, speak later<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Responding to questions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Citing authorities<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Statutes<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Cases<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Case Law Reports<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Authorities against you<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Textbooks and articles<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Concluding your argument<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Try It Yourself<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Enter a mooting competition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Organise a mooting competition<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Planning<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Structure<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Rules and procedures<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Moot questions<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
Martin James was convicted of the murder of Laurence Giggs and sentenced to life imprisonment at Stokepool Crown Court. The facts disclosed at his trial were that he and Mr Giggs were members of Stokepool University’s white-water-rafting team. They were widely regarded as the best two members of the team. Therefore, the rivalry between James and Giggs to become team leader was intense. On the day in question, James and Giggs were the only two persons on board a small raft they had taken out to survey the white water rapids at Crescent Falls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The Stoke-On-Trent Motor Show is the largest annually held motor show in the United Kingdom. In 2005, Tiger Motors plc was allocated a stand in the motor show very near to the centre of the exhibition hall. The company placed one of their new models, the XX9, on display on the stand. On the final day of the show, Mick Hugh, the managing director of Tiger Motors plc, started up the XX9 to demonstrate the tone of its engine noise to an interested customer. Unfortunately, he failed to notice that the car had been left in gear and the car lurched forward and hit Shenice Smith, aged 6\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Deborah Devagne, aged 12, had been suffering from an inoperable malignant brain tumour for 6 months. Although she was receiving significant amounts of medication to help with her pain, she was still, in the terminal stages of her life, suffering considerably. All other curative treatments had ceased, and she was being nursed at home by her parents. Following her prolonged illness, Daniel Devagne, Deborah’s father, felt that neither he nor his daughter could cope any longer with her pain and suffering, and he suffocated her with a pillow\u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\nTop 10 Tips for Mooting Success<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Useful Links<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/podcasts.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk\/#popehill<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.essexcourt.net\/mooting\/page.asp?p=134<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/zealot.mrnet.pt\/mootcourt\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=rRgS0y8nLaw<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.lawbore.net\/gotosite.php?id=914<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/learnmore.lawbore.net\/index.php\/Mooting_Video_Tutorial<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.mootshield.org\/<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
http:\/\/www.firstlight.demon.co.uk\/law\/mooting\/index.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/global.oup.com\/ukhe\/mooting\/?cc=de&lang=en&<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n