Home / Chapter Resources / Chapter 7 – Class and class struggle

Chapter 7 – Class and class struggle

In a book on cultural theory and popular culture why concern ourselves with social class? One answer is to say that class has always been a concern of this book; what has changed is that it now has its own chapter. Another is to say that although it is an ‘economic’ category, it is always lived culturally and one of the places where we recognize its existence is popular culture. Put simply, popular culture is a key site for the recognition and self-recognition of class. Class is everywhere in popular culture. It can be found quite clearly in dramas such as Downton Abbey (ITV 2010–15; film 2019) and in documentaries like Benefits Street (Channel 4 2014). It would be impossible to understand either television programme without including a critical attention to representations of class. We see it explicitly in all sorts of other things: styles of dress, holiday destinations, the books and newspapers we read, the food we eat, the music we like, how we talk to each other, where we live, our dreams and hopes for the future. We also find it implicitly in the judgements that are made about how people dress and speak, where they take their holidays, the books and newspapers they read, the music they like, where they live, and how they imagine the future. In other words, class is there in the assumptions made about what is a good or bad lifestyle.

Before you read

Warm-up

Watch a short video introducing habitus – an important notion in understanding social classes [link]. Who was this notion coined by?  What does it mean in relation to the class system and society? What important aspects of social organization does it imply?

Preliminary questions

Chapter 7 outlines the problem of class struggle, showing how the concept of class has developed in cultural theory as well as how it has evolved in the practice of contemporary societies. The idea of class it speaks of relates to various (but overlapping) understandings of the concept as proposed by Karl Marx, Raymond Williams, Richard Hoggart, E.P. Thomson and Pierre Bourdieu. It does not, however, focus on individual theories; rather, it provides an overall insight into the problem of class that these theories propose. It specifically relates to class struggle, explaining its connection to popular culture and how the popular has been the site for social distinction, especially, in relation to cultural production and representation.

The chapter traces the changes in conceptualizing social stratification that has followed the change in political-economic organization of societies. It traces that change in class vocabulary (slavery, feudalism, capitalism) and the change of systems (industrialism, neo-liberalism), proving that, although it may seem out of date, the problem of class distinction is still a vital part of our modern experience. And important thing the chapter does is explain why class in central for British cultural studies (or popular studies in general). Not only is the concept of class central to understanding cultural process, but also an element of theoretical heritage that has included class in its debate on the cultural practice.

With this in mind, look at the questions below and rethink what the chapter has to offer. Some of them will refer to specific concepts the understanding of which is fundamental for the understanding the problem of class.

  • Why is popular culture a site of class struggle?
  • In what way does the problem of class connect with cultural studies?
  • What is homogeneity?
  • What the concepts of ‘base’ and ‘superstructure’ mean and relate to?
  • How can we think of class distinction in terms of a daily experience?
  • Do you or your family experience class struggle? If yes, in what way?
  • Has the perception and practice of class changed (from the Early Modern period to contemporary times)?
  • How terms such as low culture, classical music or kitsch inform about class struggle?
  • Does class difference shows only through material goods?
  • Can you think of any seemingly symbolic forms of social stratification that cause class division?

After you read: Important ideas

The concept of class plays a key role in cultural studies and is indispensable for understanding the cultural condition of modern life. For the last decade, however, it has seen a gradual exclusion from the cultural debate and has been considered too obsolete for theorizing postmodern, de-industrialized, neo-liberal and increasingly global societies. Anita Biressi and Heather Nunn describe this problem in their Class and Contemporary British Culture, showing how debased and rejected, the theoretical validity of class division has looped back, returning class to the vocabulary of the cultural debate. By answering the questions in quizzes 7.1 and 7.2, see how this idea has developed in cultural studies and what issues it has brought out.

Quiz 7.1

Which, in your view, is correct? (Choose between true or false)

Quiz 7.2

Match the answer to the statements (choose one)

Important names

Chapter 7 highlights a number of important terms. Revisit their meanings using definition flashcards. Pause on the TERM whilst you think of the meaning, before flipping to DEFINITION (the explanation of the term).

<Insert flashcards here>

Class

A social division into groups representing the same or similar socioeconomic status

Habitus

Socially formed dispositions that structure an individual’s life environment and an individual’s propensities to feel, think and act in specific (pre-determined) ways.

Hegemony

Term associated with the work of Antonio Gramsci, referring to the way in which dominant groups in society, through processes of intellectual/moral leadership, seek to win the consent of subordinate groups in society.

Base

The economy and modes of production (e.g. feudal, capitalist).

Bourgeois(i)e

The social class which emerged and expanded in relation to capitalist modes of production; the middle class.

Superstructure

Social, cultural, legal and other arrangements which operate in relation to a particular economic base.

Consumption

is a marker of an individual’s position in society. What we buy – from food to cultural products – reflects on our social status and belonging. As such, CONSUMPTION relates to people’s social identity and how they fit in a particular cultural context. It, therefore, entails the notion of TASTE which reflects the relationship between an individual and the social, and how this relationship balances (or misbalances) the individual preference against socially legitimized options and impacts consumption.

Cultural disposition

a socially shaped view of the world represented by one’s ‘tendency’, ‘propensity’, or ‘inclination’, manifested in one’s choice of education, cultural content, entertainment, interests, professional career etc. CULTURAL DISPOSITION is a result of one’s life environment and one’s upbringing (HABITUS), convincing that what we are as individuals is mostly an effect of our nurture and its social construction.

Social distinction

factors (and powers) that impose a given system of values by ascribing meaning and various degree of significance to the components of human lived experience.

Taste

Is what preconditions human preferences and choices in the social context. According to Bourdieu, taste is not an innocent, pure ‘ability’ but an effect of many politically, economically, and socially regulated factors that mould human liking and modes of appreciation. It is also what positions an individual in a given social group (or class) and against other groups (or classes). TASTE is, therefore, a means of social stratification whereby an individual becomes identified through the hierarchies of taste that inform about what is considered aesthetically valuable. As such, the notion of TASTE makes people constantly redefine themselves: their sense of social belonging and personal value, by legitimate standards of aesthetic value (legitimate taste) and personal aesthetic pleasure (arbitrary taste). Because it is mostly symbolic, and seemingly situated outside of what we may directly link with aesthetic pleasure, TASTE seems something natural, so does the social stratification it propels.

Complementary materials

<Insert Icon 3 here> Listen to the podcast Class Struggle. Today and Tomorrow [link]. How does it reflect the problems and theoretical implications outlined in Chapter 7?

Further considerations

Is class struggle still relevant? What TV shows would be the best depiction of class struggle as described in Chapter 7? Discuss with fellow students, family or friends.

  Back To TopTo top