Home / Chapter Resources / Chapter 6 – Structuralism and post-structuralism

Chapter 6 – Structuralism and post-structuralism

Structuralism, unlike the other approaches discussed here, is, as Terry Eagleton (1983) points out, ‘quite indifferent to the cultural value of its object: anything from War and Peace to The War Cry will do. The method is analytical, not evaluative’ (96). Structuralism is a way of approaching texts and practices that is derived from the theoretical work of the Swiss linguist Ferdinand de Saussure. Its principal exponents are French: Louis Althusser in Marxist theory, Roland Barthes in literary and cultural studies, Michel Foucault in philosophy and history, Jacques Lacan in psychoanalysis, Claude Lévi-Strauss in anthropology and Pierre Macherey in literary theory. Their work is often very different, and at times very difficult. What unites these authors is the influence of Saussure, and the use of a particular vocabulary drawn from his work. It is as well, then, to start our exploration with a consideration of his work in linguistics. This is best approached by examining a number of key concepts.

Before you read

Warm-up

We recommend this footage on Structuralism [link] to help you get a grip on what is being discussed in Chapter 6. While watching it, think how Structuralism is outlined there, especially in relation to cultural practice (if at all).

Preliminary questions

Chapter 3 established the importance of Culturalism in the study of Popular Culture. Two key figures, Hoggart and Williams, were seen to move Cultural Studies away from a Leavisite perspective. By the time Structuralists enter the frame, seeking to move Cultural Studies in quite another direction, Popular Culture as a worthwhile object of study had already been recognized. In focusing on signs, signifiers, referents, power and discourses, these theorists – and the Post-structuralists who came after – complicate meaning even further, seeing Culture and Popular Culture in terms of a system of signs.

What do you think a sign may stand for in relation to culture, representation and meaning formation? (If possible, write down your ideas or discuss them with fellow students for further consideration).

After you read: Important ideas

Important ideas: Chapter 6 explains two key notions for cultural criticism (and understanding culture is general): that of Structuralism and Post-Structuralism. Those notions map out specific approaches to culture and signification i.e. how meaning is being formed in a cultural context. Going through the following quizzes, test your understanding of this formation in relation to specific thinkers and ideas.

Quiz 6.1

Choose one answer

Quiz 6.2

How would you refer to the following statements (Choose between true or false)

Important names

Chapter 6 mentions important structuralists and post-structuralist. See who they were with regard to their prominent ideas and their work.

Ferdinandde Saussure

Rosalind Coward

Jacques Derrida

Claude Levi-Strauss

Michel Foucault

Jacques Lacan

Complementary materials

Here is a Yale lecture on Semiotics and Structuralism by Prof. Paul H. Fry [link]. It may help you approach your further considerations.

Further considerations

Structuralist methods have had a profound impact on how Cultural Studies is thought about and practised. For example, the work of Saussure was taken up by two key figures that set about expanding and developing his Structuralist methodology. Claude Lévi-Strauss worked within the field of anthropology, examining the importance of myths. Will Wright, applying the work of Saussure and Lévi-Strauss to Western film, demonstrated how structuralist methods can be used to explain how we read such texts.

In thinking about how Lévi-Strauss claimed that myths are often structured around binary oppositions – for example, culture/nature; man/woman; good/bad; us/them – try the following exercise.

Analyse a number of adverts from television, magazines and newspapers, leaflets and promotional material (you can use online versions of these if you wish). Select your chosen text and work through these:

  • Identify the theme/product/aim of the advert
  • Begin to observe the ways in which the advert relies on binary opposites to construct meaning
  • List some of the ways in which these binary opposites constrain or enable how meaning is produced

You could also explore the above scenario in relation to the cultural texts and practices around political broadcasts or national events and religious celebrations such as Mawlid-al-Nabi, Christmas, Vikram Samvat, Easter and Rosh Hashanah.

Using a Structuralist approach, try analysing recently released films that draw on the Western genre. You may like to consider, for instance, True Grit (2010); Cowboys and Aliens (2011) and Django Unchained (2012). How are the meanings of these films specifically accounted for by Structuralism? Following this, you may like to undertake a Structuralist analysis of other film genres such as romance, horror or comedy.

The Post-structuralism of both Derrida and Lacan has often been viewed as obscure, difficult and over-complicated. However, as John Storey makes clear, both theorists can be used to explain how we might read cultural texts and practices. A key concept used by Lacan and Derrida is that of ‘the subject’ – a central tenet of Post-structuralist thinking with regards to how individual identity is constructed through discourse.

You might like to think of the markers, signs and texts which come to stand for your own identity.

If you use Facebook, how do you construct your subjectivity? What markers in the photographs and texts you post make up who you are? Is this different for different audiences? (Do you use privacy controls to manipulate the identity seen by different people?) Has your ‘self’ changed over the years or is it fixed and permanent? How do others think of your identity?

You might now like to try and theorize your discussion of these questions with reference to Foucault’s ideas about the panopticon and surveillance.

  Back To TopTo top