Combe, G. (1828). The Constitution of Man Considered in Relation to External Objects<\/em>. Edinburgh: Maclachlan & Stewart. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Eling P., & Finger, S. (2020). Franz Joseph Gall’s non-cortical faculties and their organs. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 56<\/em>(1), 7-19. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.21994<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Finger, S., & Eling, P. (2022). The quest for objectivity and measurements in\u202fphrenology\u2019s \u201cbumpy\u201d history.\u202fHistory of Psychology, 25<\/em>(3), 211\u2011244.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000213<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Finger,\u202fS.\u202f(2019). Mark Twain’s life-long fascination with phrenology.\u202fJournal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences<\/em>\u202f55(2),\u202f99\u00ad-121.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.21960<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lilleleht, E. (2015). \u201cAssuming the privilege\u201d of bridging divides: Abigail Fowler-Chumos, practical\u202fphrenology, and America\u2019s Gilded Age.\u202fHistory of Psychology, 18<\/em>(4), 414\u2013432.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0039476<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lilleleht, E. (2022).\u202fAn organ of murder: Crime, violence, and phrenology in nineteenth-century America.<\/em>\u202fRutgers University Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Parker Jones, O., Alfaro-Almagro, F., & Jbabdi. S., (2018). An empirical, 21st<\/sup> century evaluation of phrenology. Cortex, 106, <\/em>26-35. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.cortex.2018.04.011<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Poskett, J. (2019). Materials of the Mind: Phrenology, race, and the global history of science, 1815-1920<\/em>. University of Chicago Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Sysling, F. (2021). Phrenology and the average person, 1840\u20131940.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f34<\/em>(2), 27-45.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695120984070<\/a>\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n Van Wyhe, J. (2004).\u00a0Phrenology and the origins of\u00a0Victorian scientific naturalism<\/em>. Aldershot: Ashgate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Barnes, J. (2021). Revisiting the \u2018Darwin\u2013Marx correspondence\u2019: Multiple discovery and the rhetoric of priority. History of the Human Sciences<\/em>, 35<\/em>(2), 29-54. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951211019226<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bradley, B. (2020). Darwin’s psychology<\/em>. Oxford University Press. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1093\/oso\/9780198708216.001.0001<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n de Carvalho, V. O., & Coelho, N. E. (2024). Freudian naturalism and the assessment of psychoanalysis as a natural science: Psychic phenomenon as process.\u202fTheory & Psychology<\/em>,\u202f34<\/em>(2), 170-190.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09593543241229047<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Goetz, A. T., & Shackelford, T. K. (2006). Modern application of evolutionary theory to psychology: Key concepts and clarifications. The American Journal of Psychology, 119<\/em>(4), 567-584. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/20445364<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Jarrett, S. (2020). Consciousness reduced: The role of the \u2018idiot\u2019 in early evolutionary psychology. History of the Human Sciences<\/em>, 33(5), 110-137. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695120911557<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Malone, J. C. (2021). Darwin, Darwinism, and psychology. Behavior and Philosophy 49<\/em>(24), 1053-8348. https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27204272<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Pichel, B. (2016). From facial expressions to bodily gestures: Passions, photography and movement in French 19th-century sciences.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f29<\/em>(1), 27-48.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695115618592<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Racine, T. P. (2021). The rhetorical use of B. F. Skinner in evolutionary psychology. Theory & Psychology, 32<\/em>(1), 61-81. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09593543211030342<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Richards, R. J. (1987).\u202fDarwin and the emergence of evolutionary theories of mind and behavior<\/em>. University of Chicago Press <\/p>\n\n\n\n Richardson, A. (2013).\u202fAfter Darwin: Animals, emotions, and the mind<\/em>. Rodopi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Wackers, G. (2025). Digital phenotyping of the mind: From biology to psychoinformatics. Theory & Psychology, 35<\/em>(2), 141-162. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09593543251322116<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Asprem, E. (2010), A nice arrangement of heterodoxies: William Mcdougall and the professionalization of psychical research. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 46<\/em>(2) 123-143. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.20422<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Blum, D. (2014).\u202fGhost hunters: William James and the search for scientific proof of life after death<\/em>. Penguin Books. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Cypert, R., & Petro, M. S. (2024). A faith in science: Gardner Murphy and parapsychology.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f38<\/em>(1), 78-98.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951241280534<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Evrard, R., Pratte, E. A., & Carde\u00f1a, E. (2018). Pierre Janet and the enchanted boundary of psychical research.\u202fHistory of Psychology, 21<\/em>(2), 100\u2013125.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000086<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Gyimesi, J. (2012). S\u00e1ndor Ferenczi and the problem of telepathy.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f25<\/em>(2), 131-148.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695111434253<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review 48<\/em>(6), 781-795. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/2095325<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Hacking, I. (1988). Telepathy: Origins of randomization in experimental design.\u202fIsis<\/em>,\u202f79<\/em>, 427\u2013451. http:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/234674<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Kloosterman, I. (2012). Psychical research and parapsychology interpreted: suggestions from the international historiography of psychical research and parapsychology for investigating its history in the Netherlands.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f25<\/em>(2), 2-22.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695111421580<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lachapelle, S. (2005). Attempting science: the creation and early development of the Institut M\u00e9tapsychique International in Paris, 1919-1931.\u202fJournal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences<\/em>,\u202f41<\/em>(1), 1\u201324. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.20061<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lamont, P. (2013). Spiritualism and a mid-Victorian crisis of evidence. Historical Journal, 56<\/em>(3), 833\u2013860. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0018246X04004030<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n M\u00fclberger, A., & Balltondre, M. (2012). Metapsychics in Spain: acknowledging or questioning the marvellous?\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f25<\/em>(2), 108-130.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695112439374<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Owen, A. (1989).\u202fThe darkened room: Women, power and spiritualism in late nineteenth century England<\/em>. Virago. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Parra, A. (2025), Spiritualism and Psychology in Argentina: The Inception of Parapsychology in the Scientific Mainstream (1948\u20131955). Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 61: e70035.<\/em>\u202f<\/em>https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.70035<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Sommer, A. (2012). Psychical research and the origins of American psychology: Hugo M\u00fcnsterberg, William James and Eusapia Palladino.\u202fHistory of the Human Sciences<\/em>,\u202f25<\/em>(2), 23\u201344. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695112439376<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Wolffram, H. (2006), Parapsychology on the couch: The psychology of occult belief in Germany, c. 1870\u20131939. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 42<\/em>(3) 237-260.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.20171<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Wooffitt, R., & Allistone, S. (2005). Towards a Discursive Parapsychology: Language and the Laboratory Study of Anomalous Communication.\u202fTheory & Psychology<\/em>,\u202f15<\/em>(3), 325-355.\u202fhttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0959354305053218<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Bultman, S. (2020). Seeing inside the child: The Rorschach inkblot test as assessment technique in a girls\u2019 reform school, 1938\u20131948. History of Psychology, 23<\/em>(4), 312\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000167<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Burman, E. (2017).\u202fDeconstructing developmental psychology<\/em>\u202f(Third edition). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Gigerenzer, G. (1992). Discovery in cognitive psychology: New tools inspire new theories.\u202fScience in Context<\/em>,\u202f5<\/em>(2), 329\u2013350. doi:10.1017\/S0269889700001216<\/p>\n\n\n\n Harris, B. (2011). Arnold Gesell\u2019s progressive vision: Child hygiene, socialism and eugenics.\u202fHistory of Psychology<\/em>,\u202f14<\/em>(3), 311\u2013334. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/a0024797<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Moro, C. (2016). To encounter, to build the world and to become a human being. Advocating for a material-cultural turn in developmental psychology.\u202fIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science<\/em>,\u202f50<\/em>(4), 586\u2013602. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s12124-016-9356-4<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Ossmer, C. (2020). Normal development: The photographic dome and the children of the Yale Psycho-Clinic.\u202fIsis<\/em>,\u202f111<\/em>(3), 515\u2013541. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/711127<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Ratcliff, M. J. (2024). Jean Piaget and the autonomous disciples, Alina Szeminska and B\u00e4rbel Inhelder: From the \u201ccritical method\u201d to the appropriation of research culture. History of Psychology, 27(<\/em>4), 317\u2013332. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000261<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Rietmann, F. E. (2023). Mother-blaming revisited: Gender, cinematography, and infant research in the heyday of psychoanalysis. History of the Human Sciences, 37(<\/em>2), 87-116. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951231187556<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Rowold, K. (2024). Child psychology from Vienna to London: Charlotte B\u00fchler, concepts of childhood, and parenting advice in interwar Britain. History of the Human Sciences, 38<\/em>(1), 3-25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951241289028<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Sims-Schouten, W. (2021). \u2018A troublesome girl is pushed through\u2019: Morality, biological determinism, resistance, resilience, and the Canadian child migration schemes, 1883\u20131939. History of the Human Sciences, 35<\/em>(1), 87-110. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951211036553<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Skagius, P. (2019). Brains and psyches: Child psychological and psychiatric expertise in a Swedish newspaper, 1980\u20132008. History of the Human Sciences, 32<\/em>(3), 76-99. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695118810284<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n van der Horst, F. C. P., van Rosmalen, L., & van der Veer, R. (2019). Research notes: John Bowlby\u2019s critical evaluation of the work of Ren\u00e9 Spitz. History of Psychology, 22<\/em>(2), 205\u2013208. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000127b<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Alder, K. (2002). A social history of untruth: Lie detection and trust in twentieth-century America, Representations, 80<\/em>(1), 1-33. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1525\/rep.2002.80.1.1<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Alder, K. (2007). The lie detectors: The history of an American obsession<\/em>. New York: Free Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Balmer, A.S. & Sandland, R. (2012). Making monsters: The polygraph, the plethysmograph, and other practices for the performance of abnormal sexuality. Journal of Law and Society, 39<\/em>(4), 593-615. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.1467-6478.2012.00601.x<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Balmer, A.S. (2018). Lie detection and the law: Torture, technology and truth. Routledge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bunn, G. C. (2007). Spectacular science: The lie detector’s ambivalent powers. History of Psychology, 10<\/em>(2), 156\u2013178. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1093-4510.10.2.156<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Bunn, G. C. (2012). The truth machine: A social history of the lie detector<\/em>. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Bunn, G. C. (2019). \u2018Supposing that truth is a woman, what then?\u2019: The lie detector, the love machine, and the logic of fantasy. History of the Human Sciences, 32<\/em>(5), 135-163. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695119867022<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Derksen, M. (2012). Control and resistance in the psychology of lying. Theory & Psychology, 22<\/em>(2), 196-212. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0959354311427487<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Foucault, M. (1980). Power\/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972\u20131977<\/em> (C. Gordon, Ed.). New York: Pantheon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Littlefield, M. M. (2011). The lying brain: Lie detection in science and science fiction<\/em>. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Scott, P., & von Unger, H. (2021). Discourses on im\/migrants, ethnic minorities, and infectious disease: Fifty years of tuberculosis reporting in the United Kingdom. History of the Human Sciences, 35<\/em>(1), 189-215. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09526951211015886<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Sims-Schouten, W., Riley, S. C. E., & Willig, C. (2007). Critical realism in discourse analysis: A presentation of a systematic method of analysis using women\u2019s talk of motherhood, childcare and female employment as an example. Theory & Psychology, 17<\/em>(1), 101-124. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0959354307073153<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n Viner, R. (1996), Melanie Klein and Anna Freud: The discourse of the early dispute. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 32<\/em>(1), 4-15. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/(SICI)1520-6696(199601)32:1<4::AID-JHBS1>3.0.CO;2-Y<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Boudewijnse, G.-J. A., Murray, D. J., & Bandomir, C. A. (2001). The fate of Herbart’s mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 4<\/em>(2), 107\u2013132. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1093-4510.4.2.107<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Cowles, M. (2001). Statistics in Psychology: An historical perspective<\/em>. Lawrence Erlbaum. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Crone, G., & Green, C. D. (2025). Tools of the data detective: A review of statistical methods to detect data and result anomalies in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 35<\/em>(3), 359-380. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09593543241311861<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research<\/em>. Cambridge University Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Friendly, M. and Denis, D. (2005), The early origins and development of the scatterplot. Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 41(<\/em>2), 103-130. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.20078<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Kr\u00fcger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life<\/em>. Cambridge University Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lamiell, J. T. (2018). Re-centering psychology: From variables and statistics to persons and their stories. Theory & Psychology, 29<\/em>(2), 282-284. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0959354318766714<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lovie, S., & Lovie, P. (2004). A privileged and exemplar resource: Traumatic avoidance learning and the early triumph of mathematical psychology. History of Psychology, 7<\/em>(3), 248\u2013264. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/1093-4510.7.3.248<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Lusinchi, D. (2022). Ki\u00e6r and the rebirth of the representative method: A case-study in controversy management at the International Statistical Institute (1895\u20131903). Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 58(<\/em>2), 163\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jhbs.22145<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Michell, J. (1997). Quantitative science and the definition of measurement in psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 88<\/em>(3), 355\u2013383. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/j.2044-8295.1997.tb02641.x<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Morozova, S. V. (2022). How statistics became a \u201cforbidden trick\u201d for Soviet psychologists. History of Psychology, 25<\/em>(2), 121\u2013142. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1037\/hop0000204<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Salsburg, D. (2013).\u202fThe lady tasting tea: How statistics revolutionized science in the twentieth century<\/em>. Henry Holt and Company. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Uygun Tun\u00e7, D., Tun\u00e7, M. N., & Lakens, D. (2023). The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests. Theory & Psychology, 33<\/em>(3), 403-423. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/09593543231160112<\/a> <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/li> Angel, K. (2012). Contested psychiatric ontology and feminist critique: \u2018Female Sexual Dysfunction\u2019 and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual<\/em>. History of the Human Sciences, 25<\/em>(4), 3-24. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0952695112456949<\/a> <\/p>\n\n\n\n Borbely, A.F. (2008). Metaphor and psychoanalysis. In R. W. Gibbs (Ed.),\u202fThe Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought<\/em> (pp.412-424). Cambridge University Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Bueskens, P. (2014).\u202fMothering and psychoanalysis: Clinical, Sociological and feminist perspectives<\/em>. Demeter Press. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Copperman, J., & Chaney, S. (2024). The politics of recovery: Women\u2019s mental health activism in the UK, 1986\u20132002, with a focus on Bristol Crisis Service for Women. History of the Human Sciences, 0<\/em>(0). Chapter 2 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n
Chapter 20 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n
Chapter 19 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n
Chapter 18 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n
Chapter 17 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n
Chapter 16 – Key Readings<\/h2>\n\n