The British Psychological Society has published a set of guidelines for the ethical conduction of Internet-mediated research. Any individuals planning to complete research in cyberpsychology should review these as early as possible into their studies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.bps.org.uk\/guideline\/ethics-guidelines-internet-mediated-research<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Cyberpsychology: The Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace<\/em> is an online peer-reviewed journal with many open access articles which may be useful for further study in this field.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- www.cyberpsychology.eu\/index.php<\/a> \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
It is helpful also to keep an eye on some of the research groups in the area to see what the current topics of interest are. For example, consider visiting the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Cyberpsychology Research at the University of Wolverhampton (CRUW)\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.wlv.ac.uk\/research\/institutes-and-centres\/psychology-research\/research-clusters\/cyberpsychology-research-at-the-university-of-wolverhampton\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Oxford Internet Institute\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.oii.ox.ac.uk\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- University College Dublin (UCD) Media and Entertainment Psychology Lab\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.ucd.ie\/psychology\/research\/researchcentresandlaboratories\/mediaentertainmentlaboratory\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 2 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis article gives a helpful overview of twenty years of workshops on psychological experimentation conducted via the Internet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Birnbaum, M. H. (2021). Advanced Training in Web-Based Psychology Research. Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Psychologie<\/em>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1027\/2151-2604\/a000473<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This paper discusses the utility of online surveys for qualitative research. It gives a helpful overview and practical design information, illustrated with examples.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology<\/em>, 24<\/em>(6), 641\u2013654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645579.2020.1805550<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 3 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nA special issue of the Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication in January 2020 considers the state of the field of study. A series of fascinating articles in this issue is available at:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jcmc\/issue\/25\/1<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This paper by Julie Ancis provides an overview of cyberpsychology generally, but discusses online communication on various formats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Ancis, J. (2020). The age of cyberpsychology: An overview. Technology, Mind, and Behaviour, 1 <\/em>(1). DOI: 10.1037\/tmb0000009<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jcmc\/issue\/25\/1<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Amy Orben and Andrew Przylbylski have published multiple papers examining how adolescent well-being may or may not be affected by digital technology use, and especially focusing on methodological problems with much of the research in this area. One of their key papers is available at:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Orben, A., & Przylbylski, A.K. (2019). The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, <\/em>173\u2013182. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1038\/s41562-018-0506-1<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/www.amyorben.com\/publication\/2019_orbenprzybylski_nhb\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 4 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nMinas Michikyan focuses on the role of social media in psychosocial development and adjustment in emerging adulthood where emerging adults who experienced both identity coherence and identity confusion reported presenting the false self on Facebook motivated by self-exploration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Michikyan, M. (2020). Linking online self-presentation to identity coherence, identity confusion, and social anxiety in emerging adulthood. Br J Dev Psychol, 38: 543\u2013565.\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/bjdp.12337<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Serena Coppolino Perfumi<\/a> discusses the social identity model of deindividuation effects (SIDE model) and provides an important lens through which Internet researchers can study computer-mediated interactions. This model is particularly important in explaining the dynamics that can take place when individuals communicate via computer or, for example, utilize social media platforms.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Perfumi, S.C. (2020). Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects and Media Use. In The International Encyclopedia of Media Psychology, J. Bulck (Ed.).\u00a0<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/9781119011071.iemp0151<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
In this study, Nicole Strimbu and Michael O\u2019Connell seek to broaden the understanding of self-concept as a predictor of online self-presentation by expanding upon previous research with adolescents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Strimbu, N. and O\u2019Connell, M. (2019). The relationship between self-concept and online self-presentation in Adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking<\/a>, 22, 12<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/cyber.2019.0328<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 5 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThe following articles provide suggestions on how to prevent negative behaviour across different digital contexts:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J. W. (2020). Digital dating abuse among a national sample of U.S. youth. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36<\/em>, 11088\u201311108. 10.1177\/0886260519897344<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Laffan, D. A., Stenson, A., and Flood, C. (2022). The role of cyberbullying victimization in the relationship between adult BTS fans’ psychological sense of community and wellbeing. Journal of Community Psychology<\/em>, 1\u201316. Advanced Online Publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jcop.22924<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Salawu, S., Lumsden, J. & He, Y. (2022). A mobile-based system for preventing online abuse and cyberbullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4<\/em>, 66\u201388 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42380-021-00115-5<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Dr. Debbie Ging and Dr. Eugenia Siapera co-edited a book about the intersection of online hate and gender. It focuses on misogyny and anti-feminism in the digital environment:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Ging, D., and Siapera, E. (Eds.). (2019). Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism<\/em>. Palgrave Macmillan. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-96226-9<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Sexual harassment in online video game environments was explored in relation to the personality and context considerations:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Tang, W. Y., Reer, F., and Quandt, T. (2020). Investigating sexual harassment in online video games: \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 How personality and context factors are related to toxic sexual behaviors against fellow players. Aggressive Behavior, 46<\/em>(1), 127\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ab.21873<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Dr. Rachel Kowert catalogued a variety of negative behaviour that can occur in digital gaming spaces under the umbrella of Dark Participation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Kowert, R. (2020). Dark participation in games. Frontiers in Psychology, 11<\/em>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.598947<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 6 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis paper reviews Joseph Walther\u2019s theory of hyperpersonal communication in computer-mediated communication after 25 years. It looks at how the model applies to contemporary social media and demonstrates its application in deceptive online romance and romance scams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Walther, J. B., and Whitty, M. T. (2021). Language, psychology, and new media: The hyperpersonal model of mediated communication at twenty-five years. Journal of Language and Social Psychology<\/em>, 40<\/em>(1), 120\u2013135.
https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1177\/0261927X20967703<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\nThis chapter examines the factors in online dating that make it a less-than-enjoyable experience. The authors suggest that the primary reason that dating is not enjoyed, is that users feel they are unable to capitalize on the strongest perceived benefit of online dating, the bigger pool of potential partners.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Zytko, D., Grandhi, S., and Jones, Q. (2018). The (un) enjoyable user experience of online dating systems. In M. Blythe & A. Monk (Eds.), Funology 2<\/em> (2nd ed.,61\u201375). Springer. http:\/\/dougzytko.com\/research\/FUNOLOGY_chapter-zytko_grandhi_joneswithdoi.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
This paper explores the changing landscape of relationship formation, looking at how people meet and how this has changed over time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rosenfeld, M. J., Thomas, R. J., and Hausen, S. (2019). Disintermediating your friends: How online dating in the United States displaces other ways of meeting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences<\/em>, 116(36), 17753\u201317758. https:\/\/www.pnas.org\/doi\/full\/10.1073\/pnas.1908630116<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is common for couples to meet through online dating, and this article explains the complexity of matchmaking algorithms and looks at how our relationship with online dating apps might evolve.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Sharabi, L. L. (2022). Finding Love on a First Data: Matching Algorithms in Online Dating. Harvard Data Science Review, 4<\/em>(1).<\/p>\n\n\n\n
https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1162\/99608f92.1b5c3b7b<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 7 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis \u2018digital detox\u2019 workbook provides a hands-on guide for de-stressing, cultivating mindfulness, improving mood and health, and finding balance in your daily life:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Bowles, M. & Williams Rikard, E. (2019). Life Unplugged: A Digital Detox Workbook. New York:\u00a0 Rock Point.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This book examines the effects the Internet is having on our brains, including how smartphones and social media are influencing our thoughts and emotions:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Carr, N. (2010).\u00a0The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember<\/em>. Atlantic Books Ltd.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This book puts forth the argument that our brains aren\u2019t naturally good at media multitasking and examines how we can learn to live with technology in a balanced way. It includes dual points of view from a psychologist and a neuroscientist and provides scientific foundations and real-world examples of people addressing their own distracted minds:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Gazzaley, A., and Rosen, L. D. (2016).\u00a0The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world<\/em>. Mit Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This paper by Wood and Mu\u00f1oz examines the effect of a \u2018digital detox\u2019 on student learning:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Wood, N. T., & Mu\u00f1oz, C. (2021). Unplugged: Digital detox enhances student learning.\u00a0Marketing Education Review<\/em>,\u00a031<\/em>(1), 14-25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10528008.2020.1836973<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 8 – Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis paper by Janghee Cho and Rick Walsh investigated how potential new members of an online community create their own mental models of that online community from their first experience of the community, and how this process impacts their decision to remain in the community or not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Cho, J., and Walsh, R. (2021). How Potential New Members Approach an Online Community. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 30,<\/em><\/strong> 35\u201377. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s10606-020-09390-0<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n
In this open-access paper by Hugo Hromic and Conor Hayes, they characterised and evaluated the dynamics of online communities. They specifically differentiated between functional and structural communities for microblogging.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Hromic, H., anf Hayes, C. (2019). Characterising and evaluating dynamic online communities from live<\/p>\n\n\n\n
microblogging user interactions. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 9, Article 30<\/em><\/strong>. https:\/\/link.springer.com\/article\/10.1007\/s13278-019-0576-8<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 9 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis paper by Fogg describes the design principles behind creating persuasive technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Fogg, B. J. (2009, April). Creating persuasive technologies: An eight-step design process. In Persuasive \u201909: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology<\/em> (Article No. 44). ACM. Retrieved from: http:\/\/ejournal.narotama.ac.id\/files\/an%20eight-step%20design%20process.pdf<\/a> \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This paper by Knowles et al<\/em>. looks at the difference between persuasion and manipulation as tools used in persuasive technologies. It also introduces the BARTER system in a case study which is designed to get people to spend locally using persuasive technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Knowles, B., Coulton, P., Lochrie, M. & Wohl, B. (2014, February). \u201cConvince Us\u201d: An Argument for the Morality of Persuasion<\/em>. Paper presented at the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computer (CSCW\u201914 Workshop<\/em>) ACM, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Retrieved from: http:\/\/eprints.lancs.ac.uk\/68688\/1\/Knowles_CSCW_final.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
This chapter by Hamari et al<\/em>. is an empirical review of the research using persuasive technologies (95 in total) and categorises them from positive to negative in terms of the impact of the technologies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. and Pakkanen, T. (2014). Do persuasive technologies persuade? \u2013 A review of empirical studies. In A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro & L. Gamberini, L. (eds), Persuasive Technology: 9th International Conference, Persuasive 2014:<\/em> LNCS<\/em> 8462<\/em>, Proceedings<\/em> (pp. 118\u2013136). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from: www.skateboardingalice.com\/papers\/2014_Hamari.pdf<\/a> \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 10 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThis fascinating paper by Joanne Hinds, Emma Williams, and Adam Joinson considers how people\u2019s privacy concerns were (or were not) affected by the Cambridge Analytica case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Hinds, J., Williams, E. J., and Joinson, A. N. (2020). \u201cIt wouldn’t happen to me\u201d: Privacy concerns and perspectives following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.\u00a0International Journal of Human-Computer Studies<\/em>,\u00a0143<\/em>, 102498. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.ijhcs.2020.102498<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1071581920301002<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The Pew Research Centre has published data regarding people\u2019s perceptions of privacy online. A summary of their results and a link to the full report are available here:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/internet\/2019\/11\/15\/americans-and-privacy-concerned-confused-and-feeling-lack-of-control-over-their-personal-information\/<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Broader content on online privacy and security from the Pew Research Centre is also available at: https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/topic\/internet-technology\/technology-policy-issues\/online-privacy-security\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Bruce Schneier maintains a fascinating blog \u2018Schneier on Security\u2019. As the name suggests, the primary focus is on security, but occasional posts relate more specifically to privacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.schneier.com\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The IEEE publication Security & Privacy<\/em> includes articles, interviews, tutorials and case studies: <\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/xpl\/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8013<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 11 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nBruce Schneier\u2019s website includes a vast history of blog posts, essays, newsletters, and other writings. These examine security generally, but a significant proportion focus on cybercrime.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.schneier.com\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The International Journal of Cyber Criminology<\/em> examines cybercrime from a broader perspective than psychology alone. It includes papers on a wide variety of cybercrimes, from a multitude of academic disciplines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- www.cybercrimejournal.com<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The UK National Cyber Security Centre website includes a vast array of articles and blog posts which relate to cybercrime and cybersecurity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.ncsc.gov.uk\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The Open University provides an online course on \u2018The Psychology of Cybercrime\u2019 which provides more detailed information on many of the topics covered in this chapter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- https:\/\/www.open.edu\/openlearn\/health-sports-psychology\/psychology\/the-psychology-cybercrime\/content-section-0?active-tab=content-tab<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 12 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nThe following book specifically focuses on real world application of human behaviour in relation to the use of the Internet. Specifically, Chapter 6 explores the term Internet Addiction<\/em> from a clinical aspect.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Attrill, A. and Fullwood, C. (Ed.). (2016). Applied Cyberpsychology: Practical Applications of Cyberpsychological Theory and Research<\/em>. Palgrave MacMillan.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Understanding psychological theory in relation to online behaviour is core to cyberpsychology. In this book, areas such as technology interaction and interactivity, health, gaming, and cybercrime are addressed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M., and Kuss, D. J. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
Technology itself, is neither positive nor negative, how we use technology defines its positive and negative effects on areas such as well-being. Linda Kaye explores areas of screentime, gaming, the effects of technology, and gaming among other areas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Kaye, L. K. (2022). Issues and Debates in Cyberpsychology<\/em>. McGraw Hill.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
In this article, Coyle, McGlade, Doherty and O\u2019Reilly (2011) explore the first adolescent therapeutic intervention to fully integrate a computer game into Cognitive Behavioural Therapy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Coyle, D., McGlade, N., Doherty, G., and O’Reilly, G. (2011). Exploratory evaluations of a computer game supporting cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescents. In\u00a0Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems<\/em>\u00a0(pp. 2937\u20132946). ACM.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- http:\/\/www.davidcoyle.org\/docs\/Coyle%20et%20al%20CHI2011.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The following two chapters from the book Cyberpsychology<\/em> give an outline of the areas involved in online addiction and online counselling. Attrill, A. (Ed.). (2015). Cyberpsychology<\/em>. Oxford University Press.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Chapters 11: The Psychology of Online Addictive Behaviour \u2013 Mark D. Griffiths<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Chapter 13:\u00a0 Online Therapies and Counselling \u2013 Melanie Nguyen<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
The three chapters from The Oxford Handbook of Cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press by Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M., & Kuss, D. J. (Eds.). (2019) may be of interest.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Chapter 23: A psychological overview of Gaming Disorder \u2013 Daria J. Kuss, Halley Pontes, Orsolya Kiraly and Zsolt Demetrovics<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Chapter 25: The therapeutic and health benefits of playing video games \u2013 Mark Griffiths<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Chapter 28:\u00a0 The psychosocial effects of gaming. Michelle Colder Carras, Rachel Kowert and Thornsten Quandt.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
Chapter 13 \u2013 Further Reading<\/h2>\n\n
\nOnline Journals<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
This open-access journal will enable instructors to keep up-to-date on important research being published in this area. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
- \n
- Frontiers in Psychology<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- http:\/\/www.davidcoyle.org\/docs\/Coyle%20et%20al%20CHI2011.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Coyle, D., McGlade, N., Doherty, G., and O’Reilly, G. (2011). Exploratory evaluations of a computer game supporting cognitive behavioural therapy for adolescents. In\u00a0Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems<\/em>\u00a0(pp. 2937\u20132946). ACM.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Kaye, L. K. (2022). Issues and Debates in Cyberpsychology<\/em>. McGraw Hill.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Attrill-Smith, A., Fullwood, C., Keep, M., and Kuss, D. J. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford handbook of cyberpsychology. Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- https:\/\/www.open.edu\/openlearn\/health-sports-psychology\/psychology\/the-psychology-cybercrime\/content-section-0?active-tab=content-tab<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- https:\/\/www.ncsc.gov.uk\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- www.cybercrimejournal.com<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- https:\/\/ieeexplore.ieee.org\/xpl\/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=8013<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- Broader content on online privacy and security from the Pew Research Centre is also available at: https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/topic\/internet-technology\/technology-policy-issues\/online-privacy-security\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S1071581920301002<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- Hamari, J., Koivisto, J. and Pakkanen, T. (2014). Do persuasive technologies persuade? \u2013 A review of empirical studies. In A. Spagnolli, L. Chittaro & L. Gamberini, L. (eds), Persuasive Technology: 9th International Conference, Persuasive 2014:<\/em> LNCS<\/em> 8462<\/em>, Proceedings<\/em> (pp. 118\u2013136). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from: www.skateboardingalice.com\/papers\/2014_Hamari.pdf<\/a> \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- Knowles, B., Coulton, P., Lochrie, M. & Wohl, B. (2014, February). \u201cConvince Us\u201d: An Argument for the Morality of Persuasion<\/em>. Paper presented at the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computer (CSCW\u201914 Workshop<\/em>) ACM, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Retrieved from: http:\/\/eprints.lancs.ac.uk\/68688\/1\/Knowles_CSCW_final.pdf<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- Wood, N. T., & Mu\u00f1oz, C. (2021). Unplugged: Digital detox enhances student learning.\u00a0Marketing Education Review<\/em>,\u00a031<\/em>(1), 14-25. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/10528008.2020.1836973<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- Gazzaley, A., and Rosen, L. D. (2016).\u00a0The distracted mind: Ancient brains in a high-tech world<\/em>. Mit Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Carr, N. (2010).\u00a0The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember<\/em>. Atlantic Books Ltd.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- Kowert, R. (2020). Dark participation in games. Frontiers in Psychology, 11<\/em>. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3389\/fpsyg.2020.598947<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- Tang, W. Y., Reer, F., and Quandt, T. (2020). Investigating sexual harassment in online video games: \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 How personality and context factors are related to toxic sexual behaviors against fellow players. Aggressive Behavior, 46<\/em>(1), 127\u2013135. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/ab.21873<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Ging, D., and Siapera, E. (Eds.). (2019). Gender hate online: Understanding the new anti-feminism<\/em>. Palgrave Macmillan. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/978-3-319-96226-9<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Salawu, S., Lumsden, J. & He, Y. (2022). A mobile-based system for preventing online abuse and cyberbullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 4<\/em>, 66\u201388 (2022). https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s42380-021-00115-5<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Laffan, D. A., Stenson, A., and Flood, C. (2022). The role of cyberbullying victimization in the relationship between adult BTS fans’ psychological sense of community and wellbeing. Journal of Community Psychology<\/em>, 1\u201316. Advanced Online Publication. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1002\/jcop.22924<\/a>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1089\/cyber.2019.0328<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- Strimbu, N. and O\u2019Connell, M. (2019). The relationship between self-concept and online self-presentation in Adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking<\/a>, 22, 12<\/a>.<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- https:\/\/www.amyorben.com\/publication\/2019_orbenprzybylski_nhb\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- https:\/\/academic.oup.com\/jcmc\/issue\/25\/1<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n
- Ancis, J. (2020). The age of cyberpsychology: An overview. Technology, Mind, and Behaviour, 1 <\/em>(1). DOI: 10.1037\/tmb0000009<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- \n\n
- Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology<\/em>, 24<\/em>(6), 641\u2013654. https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/13645579.2020.1805550<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/li>
- \n\n
- University College Dublin (UCD) Media and Entertainment Psychology Lab\n
- Oxford Internet Institute\n
- https:\/\/www.wlv.ac.uk\/research\/institutes-and-centres\/psychology-research\/research-clusters\/cyberpsychology-research-at-the-university-of-wolverhampton\/<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n\n\n\n
- Cyberpsychology Research at the University of Wolverhampton (CRUW)\n
- www.cyberpsychology.eu\/index.php<\/a> \u00a0<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n